Home range extension and overlap of the Ornate Tinamou (Nothoprocta ornata) in an Andean agro-ecosystem
Very little is known about the home range and movement patterns of tinamous. The Ornate Tinamou (Nothoprocta ornata), a species of the central Andes that is important for cynegetic and biomonitoring purposes, was previously reported to have a very small territory (2.43 ha). This was based solely on...
Saved in:
Published in | The Wilson journal of ornithology Vol. 125; no. 3; pp. 491 - 501 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Fort Collins
The Wilson Ornithological Society
01.09.2013
Wilson Ornithological Society |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Very little is known about the home range and movement patterns of tinamous. The Ornate Tinamou (Nothoprocta ornata), a species of the central Andes that is important for cynegetic and biomonitoring purposes, was previously reported to have a very small territory (2.43 ha). This was based solely on field observations. In order to gain a better understanding of the movement patterns, home range size, and home range overlap of this species, we radio tracked 12 adult individuals in an Andean agro-ecosystem for a full year. The birds remained within their home ranges all year; 100% MCP (minimum convex polygon) home ranges were 43.8 ± 21.6 ha (22–85 ha), 95% kernel home ranges were 58.8 ± 31.9 ha (25–118 ha) and 50% kernel core areas were 15.3 ± 8.9 ha (6–33 ha). Only two birds, probably sub-adults, showed extensive movement patterns before their death. Individuals overlapped their home ranges extensively (from 30–98% with 2–3 tagged individuals), but these values were probably higher because a small proportion of the population was tagged. No sexual differences were detected in home range size or overlap. Our results support the usefulness of Ornate Tinamou as a sentinel species in biomonitoring studies and highlight the need for further research into the philopatric and dispersion behavior of juveniles before planning cynegetic strategies. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1676%2F12-151.1 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1559-4491 1938-5447 |
DOI: | 10.1676/12-151.1 |