The combination of autofluorescence endoscopy and molecular biomarkers is a novel diagnostic tool for dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus

Objective Endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is limited by sampling error and the subjectivity of diagnosing dysplasia. We aimed to compare a biomarker panel on minimal biopsies directed by autofluorescence imaging (AFI) with the standard surveillance protocol to derive an ob...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut Vol. 64; no. 1; pp. 49 - 56
Main Authors di Pietro, Massimiliano, Boerwinkel, David F, Shariff, Mohammed Kareem, Liu, Xinxue, Telakis, Emmanouil, Lao-Sirieix, Pierre, Walker, Elaine, Couch, George, Mills, Leanne, Nuckcheddy-Grant, Tara, Slininger, Susan, O'Donovan, Maria, Visser, Mike, Meijer, Sybren L, Kaye, Philip V, Wernisch, Lorenz, Ragunath, Krish, Bergman, Jacques J G H M, Fitzgerald, Rebecca C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.01.2015
BMJ Publishing Group
SeriesOriginal article
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective Endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is limited by sampling error and the subjectivity of diagnosing dysplasia. We aimed to compare a biomarker panel on minimal biopsies directed by autofluorescence imaging (AFI) with the standard surveillance protocol to derive an objective tool for dysplasia assessment. Design We performed a cross-sectional prospective study in three tertiary referral centres. Patients with BO underwent high-resolution endoscopy followed by AFI-targeted biopsies. 157 patients completed the biopsy protocol. Aneuploidy/tetraploidy; 9p and 17p loss of heterozygosity; RUNX3, HPP1 and p16 methylation; p53 and cyclin A immunohistochemistry were assessed. Bootstrap resampling was used to select the best diagnostic biomarker panel for high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and early cancer (EC). This panel was validated in an independent cohort of 46 patients. Results Aneuploidy, p53 immunohistochemistry and cyclin A had the strongest association with dysplasia in the per-biopsy analysis and, as a panel, had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.99) for diagnosing HGD/EC. The diagnostic accuracy for HGD/EC of the three-biomarker panel from AFI+ areas was superior to AFI− areas (p<0.001). Compared with the standard protocol, this panel had equal sensitivity for HGD/EC, with a 4.5-fold reduction in the number of biopsies. In an independent cohort of patients, the panel had a sensitivity and specificity for HGD/EC of 100% and 85%, respectively. Conclusions A three-biomarker panel on a small number of AFI-targeted biopsies provides an accurate and objective diagnosis of dysplasia in BO. The clinical implications have to be studied further.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
MdP, DFB and MKS contributed equally.
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305975