Hamstring strain injuries: are we heading in the right direction?

Acute hamstring injuries are the most prevalent muscle injuries reported in sport. Despite a thorough and concentrated effort to prevent and rehabilitate hamstring injuries, injury occurrence and re-injury rates have not improved over the last three decades. This failure is most likely due to the fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of sports medicine Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 81 - 85
Main Authors Mendiguchia, Jurdan, Alentorn-Geli, Eduard, Brughelli, Matt
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine 01.02.2012
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Acute hamstring injuries are the most prevalent muscle injuries reported in sport. Despite a thorough and concentrated effort to prevent and rehabilitate hamstring injuries, injury occurrence and re-injury rates have not improved over the last three decades. This failure is most likely due to the following: (1) a lack of studies with high level of evidence into the identification and prevention of hamstring injuries and (2) a reductionist approach of the current literature. The objectives of this article are to review and critique the current literature regarding isolated risk factors, and introduce a new concept for a more comprehensive scientific understanding of how multiple risk factors contribute to hamstring strain injury. The authors hope that this new conceptual model can serve as a foundation for future evidence-based research and aid in the development of new prevention methods to decrease the high incidence of this type of injury.
Bibliography:PMID:21677318
ark:/67375/NVC-RCL34RWX-0
local:bjsports;46/2/81
href:bjsports-46-81.pdf
ArticleID:bjsports-2010-081695
istex:431AFA209EBA041B65703D76F4C3613D369AEF57
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Commentary-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ObjectType-Editorial-3
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0306-3674
1473-0480
DOI:10.1136/bjsm.2010.081695