Influence of trust on two different risk perceptions as an affective and cognitive dimension during Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in South Korea: serial cross-sectional surveys

• Published in: BMJ Open Vol. 10; no. 3; p. e033026
• Main Authors: Jang, Won Mo, Kim, Un-Na, Jang, Deok Hyun, Jung, Hyemin, Cho, Sanghyun, Eun, Sang Jun, Lee, Jin Yong
• Format: Journal Article Web Resource
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 04.03.2020; BMJ Publishing Group
• Series: Original research
• Subjects: Coronaviruses; Cross-sectional studies; Disease prevention; Disease transmission; Educational attainment; Epidemics; Gender; Households; Identification; Infectious Diseases; Interviews; Perceptions; Polls & surveys; Presidents; Questionnaires; Respiratory diseases; Response rates; Middle East; South Korea; surveys; Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; epidemics; risk and perception
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033026

ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the affective and cognitive risk perceptions in the general population of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) during the 2015 MERS coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak in South Korea and the influencing factors.DesignSerial cross-sectional design with four consecutive surveys.SettingNationwide general population in South Korea.ParticipantsOverall 4010 respondents (aged 19 years and over) from the general population during the MERS-CoV epidemic were included.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe main outcome measures were (1) affective risk perception, (2) cognitive risk perception, and (3) trust in the government. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify factors (demographic, socioeconomic, area and political orientation) associated with risk perceptions.ResultsBoth affective and cognitive risk perceptions decreased as the MERS-CoV epidemic progressed. Proportions of affective risk perception were higher in all surveys and slowly decreased compared with cognitive risk perception over time. Females (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.72–2.00; 95% CI 1.14 to 2.86) and lower self-reported household economic status respondents were more likely to perceive the affective risk. The older the adults, the higher the affective risk perception, but the lower the cognitive risk perception compared with younger adults. The respondents who had low trust in the government had higher affective (aOR 2.19–3.11; 95 CI 1.44 to 4.67) and cognitive (aOR 3.55–5.41; 95 CI 1.44 to 9.01) risk perceptions.ConclusionsThis study suggests that even if cognitive risk perception is dissolved, affective risk perception can continue during MERS-CoV epidemic. Risk perception associating factors (ie, gender, age and self-reported household economic status) appear to be noticeably different between affective and cognitive dimensions. It also indicates that trust in the government influences affective risk perception and cognitive risk perception. There is a need for further efforts to understand the mechanism regarding the general public’s risk perception for effective risk communication.