Right ventricular mechanics and contractility after aortic valve replacement surgery: a randomised study comparing minimally invasive versus conventional approach

• Published in: Open heart Vol. 5; no. 2; p. e000842
• Main Authors: Hashemi, Nashmil, Johnson, Jonas, Brodin, Lars-Åke, Gomes-Bernardes, Andreia, Sartipy, Ulrik, Svenarud, Peter, Dalén, Magnus, Bäck, Magnus, Alam, Mahbubul, Winter, Reidar
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 2018; BMJ Publishing Group
• Series: Original research article
• Subjects: Cardiovascular disease; Coronary vessels; Electrocardiography; Heart; Mechanics; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Patient satisfaction; Studies; Surgery; Surgical techniques; Task forces; Ultrasonic imaging; Valvular Heart Disease; Velocity; Sweden; cardiac function; minimally invasive; aortic valve disease; echocardiography; surgery-valve
• ISSN: 2053-3624; 2398-595X; 2053-3624
• DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000842

ObjectiveMinimally invasive aortic valve replacementsurgery (MIAVR) is an alternative surgical technique to conventional aortic valve replacement surgery (AVR) in selected patients. The randomised study Cardiac Function after Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Implantation (CMILE) showed that right ventricular (RV) longitudinal function was reduced after both MIAVR and AVR, but the reduction was more pronounced following AVR. However, postoperative global RV function was equally impaired in both groups. The purpose of this study was to explore alterations in RV mechanics and contractility following MIAVR as compared with AVR.MethodsA predefined post hoc analysis of CMILE consisting of 40 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis who were eligible for isolated surgical aortic valve replacement were randomised to MIAVR or AVR. RV function was assessed by echocardiography prior to surgery and 40 days post-surgery.ResultsComparing preoperative to postoperative values, RV longitudinal strain rate was preserved following MIAVR (−1.5±0.5 vs −1.5±0.4 1/s, p=0.84) but declined following AVR (−1.7±0.3 vs −1.4±0.3 1/s, p<0.01). RV longitudinal strain reduced following AVR (−27.4±2.9% vs −18.8%±4.7%, p<0.001) and MIAVR (−26.5±5.3% vs −20.7%±4.5%, p<0.01). Peak systolic velocity of the lateral tricuspid annulus reduced by 36.6% in the AVR group (9.3±2.1 vs 5.9±1.5 cm/s, p<0.01) and 18.8% in the MIAVR group (10.1±2.9 vs 8.2±1.4 cm/s, p<0.01) when comparing preoperative values with postoperative values.ConclusionsRV contractility was preserved following MIAVR but was deteriorated following AVR. RV longitudinal function reduced substantially following AVR. A decline in RV longitudinal function was also observed following MIAVR, however, to a much lesser extent.