Quantification of glyceryl trinitrate effect through analysis of the synthesised ascending aortic pressure waveform

Objective: To establish through analysis of the radial pressure pulse waveform the dose dependent effects of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) on properties of different blood vessels. Design: Radial pulse waveform was measured in randomised order before, during a five hour application of a GTN patch delive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart (British Cardiac Society) Vol. 88; no. 2; pp. 143 - 148
Main Authors Jiang, X J, O'Rourke, M F, Jin, W Q L, Liu, L S, Li, C W, Tai, P C, Zhang, X C, Liu, S Z
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society 01.08.2002
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Copyright 2002 by Heart
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective: To establish through analysis of the radial pressure pulse waveform the dose dependent effects of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) on properties of different blood vessels. Design: Radial pulse waveform was measured in randomised order before, during a five hour application of a GTN patch delivering 0.104–0.625 mg/h, and for two hours after patch removal. The radial pressure waveform (Millar applanation tonometer) was convolved into an ascending aortic wave using a generalised transfer function (SphygmoCor process) enabling measurement of aortic systolic, diastolic, pulse, mean, and augmented pressure and left ventricular ejection duration in addition to standard brachial cuff pressures. Setting: Fu Wai and Ren Ming hospitals in Beijing, China. Patients: 46 recumbent hospitalised patients aged 56 (9) years, awaiting electrophysiological or other diagnostic studies, fasting, and with other treatments suspended. Major outcome measures: Conventional brachial pressure measures and data from the synthesised aortic pulse. Results: There was no consistent change in heart rate or brachial pressures except for a decrease in systolic and pulse pressures (p < 0.01) at dose > 0.416 mg/h. In contrast, there were substantial and significant (p < 0.0001) decreases in aortic systolic, pulse, and augmented pressures at all doses, mean pressure (p < 0.001) at doses > 0.416 mg/h, and ejection duration (p < 0.001) at doses > 0.208 mg/h. Conclusions: Pulse waveform analysis exposes dose dependent effects of GTN on the aortic waveform, suggesting muscular conduit arterial dilatation with reduced wave reflection at the lowest dose, arteriolar dilatation and decreased peripheral resistance at the highest dose, and venous dilatation at the intermediate dose.
Bibliography:href:heartjnl-88-143.pdf
istex:10A52BE6B3795818B5A4E11DE9DD809EBBE4DF4C
local:0880143
PMID:12117838
Correspondence to:
 Dr M F O'Rourke, St Vincent's Clinic, 438 Victoria Street, NSW 2010, Australia;
 M.ORourke@unsw.edu.au
ark:/67375/NVC-DFFHV3Z0-L
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Correspondence to: …Dr M F O'Rourke, St Vincent's Clinic, 438 Victoria Street, NSW 2010, Australia; …M.ORourke@unsw.edu.au
Founding director of AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heart.88.2.143