Validity of retrospective occupational exposure estimates of lead and manganese in a case–control study

ObjectivesThe validity of surrogate measures of retrospective occupational exposure in population-based epidemiological studies has rarely been evaluated. Using toenail samples as bioindicators of exposure, we assessed whether work tasks and expert assessments of occupational metal exposure obtained...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inOccupational and environmental medicine (London, England) Vol. 76; no. 9; pp. 680 - 687
Main Authors Sauvé, Jean-François, Ramsay, Joemy M, Locke, Sarah J, Dopart, Pamela J, Josse, Pabitra R, Zaebst, Dennis D, Albert, Paul S, Cantor, Kenneth P, Baris, Dalsu, Jackson, Brian P, Karagas, Margaret R, Hosain, GM Monawar, Schwenn, Molly, Johnson, Alison, Purdue, Mark P, Koutros, Stella, Silverman, Debra T, Friesen, Melissa C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.09.2019
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectivesThe validity of surrogate measures of retrospective occupational exposure in population-based epidemiological studies has rarely been evaluated. Using toenail samples as bioindicators of exposure, we assessed whether work tasks and expert assessments of occupational metal exposure obtained from personal interviews were associated with lead and manganese concentrations.MethodsWe selected 609 controls from a case–control study of bladder cancer in New England who had held a job for ≥1 year 8–24 months prior to toenail collection. We evaluated associations between toenail metal concentrations and five tasks extracted from occupational questionnaires (grinding, painting, soldering, welding, working near engines) using linear regression models. For 139 subjects, we also evaluated associations between the toenail concentrations and exposure estimates from three experts.ResultsWe observed a 1.9-fold increase (95% CI 1.4 to 2.5) in toenail lead concentrations with painting and 1.4-fold increase (95% CI 1.1 to 1.7) in manganese concentrations with working around engines and handling fuel. We observed significant trends with increasing frequency of both activities. For lead, significant trends were observed with the ratings from all three experts. Their average ratings showed the strongest association, with subjects rated as possibly or probably exposed to lead having concentrations that were 2.0 and 2.5 times higher, respectively, than in unexposed subjects (ptrend <0.001). Expert estimates were only weakly associated with manganese toenail concentrations.ConclusionsOur findings support the ability of experts to identify broad contrasts in previous occupational exposure to lead. The stronger associations with task frequency and expert assessments support using refined exposure characterisation whenever possible.
Bibliography:Original article
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Co-supervised this work
DB, KPC, MRK, GMMH, MS, AJ, SK, and DTS are responsible for the New England Bladder Cancer Study, including subject recruitment, data collection, study management, and on-going analyses using study data. The analysis of toenail samples was led by BPJ. JFS, JMR, SJL, PJD, PSA, MPP, SK, DTS, and MCF designed the validation study. JMR, SJL, PRJ, DDZ, and MCF conducted the exposure assessment. Statistical analyses were conducted by JFS, JMR, PSA, SK, DTS, and MCF. Drafting of the manuscript was performed by JFS, JMR, DTS, and MCF. All authors read draft manuscripts, contributed to the interpretation of findings, and provided comments and revisions. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Contributors
ISSN:1351-0711
1470-7926
1470-7926
DOI:10.1136/oemed-2019-105744