Validity of retrospective occupational exposure estimates of lead and manganese in a case–control study
ObjectivesThe validity of surrogate measures of retrospective occupational exposure in population-based epidemiological studies has rarely been evaluated. Using toenail samples as bioindicators of exposure, we assessed whether work tasks and expert assessments of occupational metal exposure obtained...
Saved in:
Published in | Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) Vol. 76; no. 9; pp. 680 - 687 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
01.09.2019
BMJ BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ObjectivesThe validity of surrogate measures of retrospective occupational exposure in population-based epidemiological studies has rarely been evaluated. Using toenail samples as bioindicators of exposure, we assessed whether work tasks and expert assessments of occupational metal exposure obtained from personal interviews were associated with lead and manganese concentrations.MethodsWe selected 609 controls from a case–control study of bladder cancer in New England who had held a job for ≥1 year 8–24 months prior to toenail collection. We evaluated associations between toenail metal concentrations and five tasks extracted from occupational questionnaires (grinding, painting, soldering, welding, working near engines) using linear regression models. For 139 subjects, we also evaluated associations between the toenail concentrations and exposure estimates from three experts.ResultsWe observed a 1.9-fold increase (95% CI 1.4 to 2.5) in toenail lead concentrations with painting and 1.4-fold increase (95% CI 1.1 to 1.7) in manganese concentrations with working around engines and handling fuel. We observed significant trends with increasing frequency of both activities. For lead, significant trends were observed with the ratings from all three experts. Their average ratings showed the strongest association, with subjects rated as possibly or probably exposed to lead having concentrations that were 2.0 and 2.5 times higher, respectively, than in unexposed subjects (ptrend <0.001). Expert estimates were only weakly associated with manganese toenail concentrations.ConclusionsOur findings support the ability of experts to identify broad contrasts in previous occupational exposure to lead. The stronger associations with task frequency and expert assessments support using refined exposure characterisation whenever possible. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Original article ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Co-supervised this work DB, KPC, MRK, GMMH, MS, AJ, SK, and DTS are responsible for the New England Bladder Cancer Study, including subject recruitment, data collection, study management, and on-going analyses using study data. The analysis of toenail samples was led by BPJ. JFS, JMR, SJL, PJD, PSA, MPP, SK, DTS, and MCF designed the validation study. JMR, SJL, PRJ, DDZ, and MCF conducted the exposure assessment. Statistical analyses were conducted by JFS, JMR, PSA, SK, DTS, and MCF. Drafting of the manuscript was performed by JFS, JMR, DTS, and MCF. All authors read draft manuscripts, contributed to the interpretation of findings, and provided comments and revisions. All authors have read and approved the manuscript. Contributors |
ISSN: | 1351-0711 1470-7926 1470-7926 |
DOI: | 10.1136/oemed-2019-105744 |