Thoracic versus coronary calcification for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events prediction

This study compared the prognostic value of quantified thoracic artery calcium (TAC) including aortic arch on chest CT and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score on ECG-gated cardiac CT.MethodsA total of 2412 participants who underwent both chest CT and ECG-gated cardiac CT at the same period were incl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart (British Cardiac Society) Vol. 110; no. 14; pp. 947 - 953
Main Authors Ichikawa, Keishi, Wang, Rui, McClelland, Robyn L, Manubolu, Venkat S, Susarla, Shriraj, Lee, Duo, Pourafkari, Leili, Fazlalizadeh, Hooman, Bitar, Jairo Aldana, Robin, Rick, Kinninger, April, Roy, Sion, Post, Wendy S, Budoff, Matthew
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society 25.06.2024
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study compared the prognostic value of quantified thoracic artery calcium (TAC) including aortic arch on chest CT and coronary artery calcium (CAC) score on ECG-gated cardiac CT.MethodsA total of 2412 participants who underwent both chest CT and ECG-gated cardiac CT at the same period were included in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Exam 5. All participants were monitored for incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. TAC is defined as calcification in the ascending aorta, aortic arch and descending aorta on chest CT. The quantification of TAC was measured using the Agatston method. Time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the prognostic value of TAC and CAC scores.ResultsParticipants were 69±9 years of age and 47% were male. The Spearman correlation between TAC and CAC scores was 0.46 (p<0.001). During the median follow-up period of 8.8 years, 234 participants (9.7%) experienced ASCVD events. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, TAC score was independently associated with increased risk of ASCVD events (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.58) as well as CAC score (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.17). However, the area under the time-dependent ROC curve for CAC score was greater than that for TAC score in all participants (0.698 and 0.641, p=0.031). This was particularly pronounced in participants with borderline/intermediate and high 10-year ASCVD risk scores.ConclusionOur study demonstrated a significant association between TAC and CAC scores but a superior prognostic value of CAC score for ASCVD events. These findings suggest TAC on chest CT provides supplementary data to estimate ASCVD risk but does not replace CAC on ECG-gated cardiac CT.
Bibliography:Original research
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Keishi Ichikawa: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft, Rui Wang: Data curation, Formal analysis, Robyn L McClelland: Data curation, Formal analysis, Venkat S. Manubolu: Writing – Review & Editing, Shriraj Susarla: Data collection, Writing – Review & Editing, Duo Lee: Data collection, Writing – Review & Editing, Leili Pourafkari: Writing – Review & Editing, Hooman Fazlalizadeh: Writing – Review & Editing, Jairo Aldana-Bitar: Writing – Review & Editing, Rick Robin: Data collection, Writing – Review & Editing, April Kinninger: Data curation, Writing – Review & Editing, Sion Roy: Writing – Review & Editing, Wendy S. Post: Writing – Review & Editing, Matthew Budoff: Writing – Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision.
Author’s Contribution
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2023-323838