Constipation among workers with depression/anxiety: a retrospective study using a claims database and survey data in Japan
ObjectivesTo investigate the prevalence, associated factors, treatment status and burden of constipation in workers with depression or anxiety.Study designThis was a retrospective observational study using a pre-existing database.SettingClaims data from October to November 2022 and data from the sur...
Saved in:
Published in | BMJ open Vol. 14; no. 11; p. e083668 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
British Medical Journal Publishing Group
19.11.2024
BMJ Publishing Group LTD BMJ Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | ObjectivesTo investigate the prevalence, associated factors, treatment status and burden of constipation in workers with depression or anxiety.Study designThis was a retrospective observational study using a pre-existing database.SettingClaims data from October to November 2022 and data from the survey conducted in November 2022 were extracted from the database.ParticipantsThis study included self-reported workers who completed the survey, after excluding those with major mental disorders diagnosed as distinct from depression or anxiety and constipation due to organic diseases identified by International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) codes.Outcome measuresThe subjects were divided into three groups: treated depression/anxiety, untreated depression/anxiety and no depression/anxiety. The prevalence of constipation, factors associated with constipation and medications prescribed for constipation were analysed. Work productivity and quality of life (QOL) were compared between three subgroups based on constipation status: treated constipation, untreated constipation and no constipation subgroup.ResultsOf the 18 585 respondents in the analysis population, 950 respondents (5.1%) were classified into the treated depression/anxiety group, 6035 respondents (32.5%) into the untreated depression/anxiety group and the remaining respondents into the no depression/anxiety group (11 600 (62.4%)). The prevalence of constipation was 22.5% in the treated group, 22.3% in the untreated group and 10.4% in the no depression/anxiety group, respectively. Depression and anxiety severity were independently associated with an increased risk of constipation. In all groups, the most commonly prescribed drug class was osmotic laxatives. Work productivity and QOL tended to indicate a greater burden in the untreated constipation subgroup than in the treated or no constipation subgroups.ConclusionsThe prevalence of constipation was twice as high if workers had depression/anxiety. Considering that the comorbidity of constipation with mental disorders may increase multiple burdens, appropriate medical interventions are required to treat both mental (depression/anxiety) and physical (constipation) conditions. This should be widely recognised by physicians and employers. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Original research ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise. YK, KNoz, and KNom are employees of Viatris Pharmaceuticals Japan Inc. SF declares lecture fees from Viatris Pharmaceutical during the conduct of the study and they had no relation to this study. Relationship between Dr. SF and Viatris Pharmaceutical was officially approved by the bureau of conflict of interest management of Tohoku University. |
ISSN: | 2044-6055 2044-6055 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083668 |