Enablers and barriers in upscaling telemonitoring across geographic boundaries: a scoping review

• Published in: BMJ open Vol. 12; no. 4; p. e057494
• Main Authors: Gijsbers, Harm, Feenstra, Tim M, Eminovic, Nina, van Dam, Debora, Nurmohamed, Shaikh Azam, van de Belt, Tom, Schijven, Marlies P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 20.04.2022; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group
• Series: Original research
• Subjects: Change management; Electronic health records; Health Informatics; Humans; Internet; Medical research; Meta-analysis; Monitoring, Physiologic; Patients; Personal health; Research Design; Research methodology; Software; Telemedicine; Telemedicine; Change management; Health informatics
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057494

Introduction and objectiveTelemonitoring is a method to monitor a person’s vital functions via their physiological data at distance, using technology. While pilot studies on the proposed benefits of telemonitoring show promising results, it appears challenging to implement telemonitoring on a larger scale. The aim of this scoping review is to identify the enablers and barriers for upscaling of telemonitoring across different settings and geographical boundaries in healthcare.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cinahl, Web of Science, ProQuest and IEEE databases were searched. Resulting outcomes were assessed by two independent reviewers. Studies were considered eligible if they focused on remote monitoring of patients’ vital functions and data was transmitted digitally. Using scoping review methodology, selected studies were systematically assessed on their factors of influence on upscaling of telemonitoring.ResultsA total of 2298 titles and abstracts were screened, and 19 articles were included for final analysis. This analysis revealed 89 relevant factors of influence: 26 were reported as enabler, 18 were reported as barrier and 45 factors were reported being both. The actual utilisation of telemonitoring varied widely across studies. The most frequently mentioned factors of influence are: resources such as costs or reimbursement, access or interface with electronic medical record and knowledge of frontline staff.ConclusionSuccessful upscaling of telemonitoring requires insight into its critical success factors, especially at an overarching national level. To future-proof and facilitate upscaling of telemonitoring, it is recommended to use this type of technology in usual care and to find means for reimbursement early on. A wide programme on change management, nationally or regionally coordinated, is key. Clear regulatory conditions and professional guidelines may further facilitate widespread adoption and use of telemonitoring. Future research should focus on converting the ‘enablers and barriers’ as identified by this review into a guideline supporting further nationwide upscaling of telemonitoring.