Acupuncture versus massage for pain in patients living with advanced cancer: a protocol for the IMPACT randomised clinical trial

• Published in: BMJ open Vol. 12; no. 9; p. e058281
• Main Authors: Romero, Sally A D, Emard, Nicholas, Baser, Raymond E, Panageas, Katherine, MacLeod, Jodi, Walker, Desiree, Barton-Burke, Margaret, Liou, Kevin, Deng, Gary, Farrar, John, Xiao, Han, Mao, Jun J, Epstein, Andrew
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 01.09.2022; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group
• Series: Protocol
• Subjects: Acupuncture; Acupuncture Therapy - methods; Adult; Anxiety; cancer pain; Cancer therapies; Clinical outcomes; Clinical practice guidelines; Clinical trials; Comorbidity; complementary medicine; Demographics; Drug therapy; Ethnicity; Fatigue; Fatigue - complications; Humans; Information systems; Insomnia; Integrative medicine; Massage; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Musculoskeletal Pain - complications; Narcotics; Neoplasms - complications; Neoplasms - psychology; Oncology; Pain management; Patients; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sleep; Treatment Outcome; United States > US; cancer pain; complementary medicine; pain management
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058281

IntroductionPain, comorbid fatigue and sleep disturbances are common and distressing symptoms for patients with advanced cancer, negatively impacting their quality of life. Clinical guidelines recommend non-pharmacological interventions, including acupuncture and massage, for pain management in adult patients with cancer in adjunct to conventional care. However, high-quality evidence about the comparative effectiveness and long-term durability of these therapies for symptom management is limited.Methods and analysisWe describe the design of a two-arm, parallel group, multicentre randomised controlled trial that investigates the use of acupuncture versus massage for musculoskeletal pain among 300 patients with diverse types of advanced cancer. The primary aim is to evaluate the long-term effectiveness (26 weeks from randomisation) of acupuncture vs massage for pain (primary outcome) and comorbid symptoms (fatigue, sleep disturbance and quality of life). The secondary aim is to identify patient-level demographic characteristics (eg, sex, race, age), clinical factors (eg, insomnia, pain severity) and psychological attributes that are associated with a greater reduction in pain for either acupuncture or massage. Patients will receive weekly acupuncture or massage treatments for 10 weeks, followed by monthly booster sessions up to 26 weeks. The primary endpoint will be the change in worst pain intensity score from baseline to 26 weeks. We will collect validated patient-reported outcomes at multiple time points over 26 weeks.Ethics and disseminationThe Institutional Review Board at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York approved this protocol. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals and conference presentations. Our findings will help patients and healthcare providers make informed decisions about incorporating non-pharmacological treatments to manage pain for patients with advanced cancer.Trial registration numberNCT04095234.