Is addition of sodium fluoride to cyclical etidronate beneficial in the treatment of corticosteroid induced osteoporosis?

OBJECTIVE To investigate whether administration of sodium fluoride (NaF) in addition to cyclical etidronate has a positive effect on bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with established osteoporosis during continued treatment with corticosteroids. PATIENTS AND METHODS 47 patients who were receivi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 56; no. 6; pp. 357 - 363
Main Authors Lems, Willem F, Jacobs, Johannes W G, Bijlsma, Johannes W J, van Veen, Gerard J M, Houben, Harry H M L, Haanen, Huub C M, Gerrits, Margot I, van Rijn, Herman J M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism 01.06.1997
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:OBJECTIVE To investigate whether administration of sodium fluoride (NaF) in addition to cyclical etidronate has a positive effect on bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with established osteoporosis during continued treatment with corticosteroids. PATIENTS AND METHODS 47 patients who were receiving treatment with corticosteroids were included in a two year randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Established osteoporosis was defined as a history of a peripheral fracture or a vertebral deformity, or both, on a radiograph. All patients were treated with cyclical etidronate, calcium, and either NaF (25 twice daily) or placebo. Vitamin D was supplemented in the case of a low serum 25 (OH) vitamin D concentration. BMD of the lumbar spine and hips was measured at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. RESULTS After two years of treatment, the BMD of the lumbar spine in the etidronate/NaF group had increased by +9.3% (95% confidence intervals (CI): +2.3% to +16.2%, p<0.01), while the BMD in the etidronate/placebo group was unchanged: +0.3% (95% CI: −2.2% to +2.8%). The difference in the change in BMD between groups was +8.9% (95% CI: +1.9% to +16.0%, p<0.01). For the hips, no significant changes in BMD were observed in the etidronate/NaF group after two years: −2.5% (95% CI: −6.8% to +1.8%); in the etidronate/placebo group BMD had significantly decreased: −4.0% (95% CI: −6.6% to −1.4%; p<0.01). The difference between the groups was not significant: +1.5% (95% CI: −3.4% to +6.4%). No significant differences in number of vertebral deformities and peripheral fractures were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION The effect of combination treatment with NaF and etidronate on the BMD of the lumbar spine in corticosteroid treated patients with established osteoporosis is superior to that of etidronate alone.
Bibliography:Dr W F Lems, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital Utrecht, P O Box 85500, 3508 CA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
href:annrheumdis-56-357.pdf
local:annrheumdis;56/6/357
istex:0F7016DAE28256CE366E7DE4CE59AC3DF070C3D1
ark:/67375/NVC-TWD3091P-Q
PMID:9227164
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard.56.6.357