First Evidence for Slave Rebellion: Enslaved Ant Workers Systematically Kill the Brood of Their Social Parasite Protomognathus americanus
During the process of coevolution, social parasites have evolved sophisticated strategies to exploit the brood care behavior of their social hosts. Slave-making ant queens invade host colonies and kill or eject all adult host ants. Host workers, which eclose from the remaining brood, are tricked int...
Saved in:
Published in | Evolution Vol. 63; no. 4; pp. 1068 - 1075 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, USA
Wiley/Blackwell
01.04.2009
Blackwell Publishing Inc Wiley-Blackwell Oxford University Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | During the process of coevolution, social parasites have evolved sophisticated strategies to exploit the brood care behavior of their social hosts. Slave-making ant queens invade host colonies and kill or eject all adult host ants. Host workers, which eclose from the remaining brood, are tricked into caring for the parasite brood. Due to their high prevalence and frequent raids, following which stolen host broods are similarly enslaved, slave-making ants exert substantial selection upon their hosts, leading to the evolution of antiparasite adaptations. However, all host defenses shown to date are active before host workers are parasitized, whereas selection was thought to be unable to act on traits of already enslaved hosts. Yet, here we demonstrate the rebellion of enslaved Temnothorax workers, which kill two-thirds of the female pupae of the slave-making ant Protomognathus americanus. Thereby, slaves decrease the long-term parasite impact on surrounding related host colonies. This novel antiparasite strategy of enslaved workers constitutes a new level in the coevolutionary battle after host colony defense has failed. Our discovery is analogous to recent findings in hosts of avian brood parasites where perfect mimicry of parasite eggs leads to the evolution of chick recognition as a second line of defense. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:061E4B18A8E9320924222650B4CF18D71CC289CB ark:/67375/WNG-JWHJX86Q-T ArticleID:EVO591 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0014-3820 1558-5646 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00591.x |