Prognostic impact of early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in patients with microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the new standard of care in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Since tumor response dynamic parameters already shown a strong association with survival outcomes in patients wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal for immunotherapy of cancer Vol. 9; no. 4; p. e002501
Main Authors Fucà, Giovanni, Corti, Francesca, Ambrosini, Margherita, Intini, Rossana, Salati, Massimiliano, Fenocchio, Elisabetta, Manca, Paolo, Manai, Chiara, Daniel, Francesca, Raimondi, Alessandra, Morano, Federica, Corallo, Salvatore, Prisciandaro, Michele, Spallanzani, Andrea, Quarà, Virginia, Belli, Carmen, Vaiani, Marta, Curigliano, Giuseppe, Cremolini, Chiara, De Braud, Filippo, Di Bartolomeo, Maria, Zagonel, Vittorina, Lonardi, Sara, Pietrantonio, Filippo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.04.2021
BMJ Publishing Group
SeriesOriginal research
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the new standard of care in microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Since tumor response dynamic parameters already shown a strong association with survival outcomes in patients with mCRC treated with first-line therapy, we investigated the association of early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DoR) in patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC treated with ICIs.MethodsThis is a retrospective, multicenter, cohort study in patients with dMMR and/or MSI-high mCRC treated with ICIs (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 with or without anti-CTLA-4 agents) with measurable disease and at least one post-baseline radiological disease reassessment. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used for survival analyses. A maximally selected statistics method in a Cox regression model for progression-free survival (PFS) was used to determine the optimal cut-offs for ETS and DoR.ResultsWe included a total of 169 patients: 116 (68.6%) were treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy, whereas 53 (31.4%) with anti-PD-1 plus anti-CTLA-4 agents. Patients with primary progressive disease (N=37, 21.9%), experienced an extremely poor overall survival (OS) and were evaluated separately. In patients with clinical benefit, we observed a significant association between ETS and DoR with both OS and PFS, and we identified a relative reduction of at least 1% as the optimal cut-off for ETS and a relative reduction of at least 50% as the optimal cut-off for DoR.ConclusionsETS and DoR are important prognostic factors in patients with MSI-high mCRC treated with ICIs that might be useful to design treatment intensification/deintensification strategies. A prospective validation of both is warranted.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
SL and FP are joint senior authors.
ISSN:2051-1426
2051-1426
DOI:10.1136/jitc-2021-002501