Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits and harms

• Published in: BMJ (Online) Vol. 350; no. jun16 3; p. h2747
• Main Authors: Thorlund, J B, Juhl, C B, Roos, E M, Lohmander, L S
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 16.06.2015; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
• Subjects: Arthritis; Arthroscopy - adverse effects; Arthroscopy - methods; Clinical Medicine; Humans; Intervention; Joint and ligament injuries; Klinisk medicin; Knee; Medical and Health Sciences; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Meta-analysis; Middle age; Older people; Orthopedics; Ortopedi; Osteoarthritis; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery; Pain; Patients; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surgery; Systematic review; Thromboembolism; Thrombosis
• ISSN: 0959-8138; 1756-1833; 1756-1833
• DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h2747

Objective To determine benefits and harms of arthroscopic knee surgery involving partial meniscectomy, debridement, or both for middle aged or older patients with knee pain and degenerative knee disease.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Main outcome measures Pain and physical function.Data sources Systematic searches for benefits and harms were carried out in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to August 2014. Only studies published in 2000 or later were included for harms.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Randomised controlled trials assessing benefit of arthroscopic surgery involving partial meniscectomy, debridement, or both for patients with or without radiographic signs of osteoarthritis were included. For harms, cohort studies, register based studies, and case series were also allowed.Results The search identified nine trials assessing the benefits of knee arthroscopic surgery in middle aged and older patients with knee pain and degenerative knee disease. The main analysis, combining the primary endpoints of the individual trials from three to 24 months postoperatively, showed a small difference in favour of interventions including arthroscopic surgery compared with control treatments for pain (effect size 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 0.26). This difference corresponds to a benefit of 2.4 (95% confidence interval 0.4 to 4.3) mm on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale. When analysed over time of follow-up, interventions including arthroscopy showed a small benefit of 3-5 mm for pain at three and six months but not later up to 24 months. No significant benefit on physical function was found (effect size 0.09, −0.05 to 0.24). Nine studies reporting on harms were identified. Harms included symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (4.13 (95% confidence interval 1.78 to 9.60) events per 1000 procedures), pulmonary embolism, infection, and death.Conclusions The small inconsequential benefit seen from interventions that include arthroscopy for the degenerative knee is limited in time and absent at one to two years after surgery. Knee arthroscopy is associated with harms. Taken together, these findings do not support the practise of arthroscopic surgery for middle aged or older patients with knee pain with or without signs of osteoarthritis.Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42014009145.