Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) using C-reactive protein underestimates disease activity and overestimates EULAR response criteria compared with DAS28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate in a large observational cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients in Japan

Objectives: To compare disease activity and the improvement of disease activity evaluated between by Disease Activity Score 28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and by DAS28 using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Data from 30...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 66; no. 9; pp. 1221 - 1226
Main Authors Matsui, Toshihiro, Kuga, Yoshiaki, Kaneko, Atsushi, Nishino, Jinju, Eto, Yoshito, Chiba, Noriyuki, Yasuda, Masayuki, Saisho, Koichiro, Shimada, Kota, Tohma, Shigeto
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism 01.09.2007
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives: To compare disease activity and the improvement of disease activity evaluated between by Disease Activity Score 28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and by DAS28 using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Data from 3073 RA patients registered in the large cohort database (NinJa: National Database of Rheumatic Diseases by iR-net in Japan) of 2003 was used to calculate DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP and disease activities were evaluated. Improvements in disease activities were also evaluated according to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria in 1482 RA patients whose DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP could be calculated from data for both 2002 and 2003. Results: The mean value of DAS28-CRP (3.59, SD 1.25) was significantly smaller than that of mean DAS28-ESR (4.31, SD 1.32) (p < 0.0001). The number of patients who satisfied the criteria of remission was 297 (9.7%) in DAS28-ESR versus 705 (22.9%) in DAS28-CRP and the number of patients with high disease activity was 842 (27.4%) versus 357 (11.6%) for DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP, respectively; there was a significant difference between the two (p < 0.0001). Change of respective DAS28 was significantly correlated (ΔDAS28-ESR −0.05, SD 1.14 versus ΔDAS28-CRP −0.10, SD 1.10) (p < 0.0001); however, the number of “good response” patients was significantly different (p < 0.03) between DAS28-ESR (97 patients, 6.5%) and DAS28-CRP (136 patients, 9.2%). Conclusions: DAS28-CRP significantly underestimated disease activity and overestimated the improvement in disease activity compared with DAS28-ESR. DAS28-CRP should be evaluated using different criteria from that for DAS28-ESR.
Bibliography:Correspondence to:
 Dr Toshihiro Matsui
 Department of Rheumatology, Sagamihara National Hospital, National Hospital Organization 18-1, Sakuradai Sagamihara-city, Kanagawa, 228-8522, Japan; t-matsui@sagamihara-hosp.gr.jp
istex:A56212B27F0F1DD093D1C0738DE0C9C780B2FD0B
ark:/67375/NVC-KV30DMPL-R
href:annrheumdis-66-1221.pdf
PMID:17369281
local:0661221
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Present address: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ogawa Red Cross Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard.2006.063834