Echocardiography-based score to predict outcome after renal transplantation

Background: Given the high cardiac mortality of renal transplant recipients, identification of high-risk patients is important to offer appropriate treatment before transplantation. Aim: To determine patients with high mortality after renal transplantation despite selection according to current crit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart (British Cardiac Society) Vol. 93; no. 4; pp. 464 - 469
Main Authors Sharma, Rajan, Chemla, Eric, Tome, Maite, Mehta, Rajnikant L, Gregson, Helen, Brecker, Stephen J D, Chang, Rene, Pellerin, Denis
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Cardiovascular Society 01.04.2007
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects
Age
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Given the high cardiac mortality of renal transplant recipients, identification of high-risk patients is important to offer appropriate treatment before transplantation. Aim: To determine patients with high mortality after renal transplantation despite selection according to current criteria. Methods: Preoperative parameters were collected from 203 renal transplant recipients over a follow-up time of 3.6 (1.9) years. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Results: 22 deaths (11%) and 12 cardiac failures (6%) were observed. Non-survivors were older (p⩽0.001), had larger left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVSD) (p⩽0.001) and end-diastolic diameter (p = 0.002), and lower ejection fraction (p⩽0.001). Left ventricular mass index (p = 0.001), maximal wall thickness (p = 0.006) and the proportion with mitral annular calcification (p = 0.001) were significantly higher in the non-survivors. The risk factors for ischaemic heart disease and exercise test data were not significantly different between the two groups. Four independent predictors of mortality after renal transplantation were identified: age ⩾50 years (p = 0.002), LVESD ⩾3.5 cm (p = 0.002), maximal wall thickness ⩾1.4 cm (p = 0.014) and mitral annular calcification (p = 0.036). The 5-year survival estimates for 0, 1, 2 and 3 prognostic factors were 96%, 86%, 69% and 38%, respectively. No patient had four prognostic factors. In patients ⩾50 years, the 5-year survival estimates for 0, 1 and 2 additional prognostic factors were 73%, 45% and 18%, respectively. Conclusion: In addition to selection according to current guidelines, age and three conventional echocardiography parameters may further improve risk stratification before renal transplantation.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-0TC8KVRH-9
Correspondence to:
 Dr D Pellerin
 The Heart Hospital, 16–18 Westmoreland Street, London W1G 8PH, UK; denis.pellerin@uclh.nhs.uk
istex:8DDA247E11B5F54A22D2F9355AE6FB5931B7C5F1
href:heartjnl-93-464.pdf
PMID:16980518
local:0930464
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1355-6037
1468-201X
DOI:10.1136/hrt.2006.096826