Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials on topical treatments for vernal keratoconjunctivitis

Aims:The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of currently available topical drugs for vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) through a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs).Methods:Twenty-seven RCTs (n = 2184 eyes) that had evaluated the efficacy of topical drugs for the treatment o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of ophthalmology Vol. 91; no. 12; pp. 1656 - 1661
Main Authors Mantelli, F, Santos, M S, Petitti, T, Sgrulletta, R, Cortes, M, Lambiase, A, Bonini, S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.12.2007
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims:The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of currently available topical drugs for vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) through a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs).Methods:Twenty-seven RCTs (n = 2184 eyes) that had evaluated the efficacy of topical drugs for the treatment of VKC were selected according to the set criteria; 10 of these trials were suitable for statistical analysis and were enrolled in the meta-analysis. Articles published up to December 2005 were identified from the following data sources: Medline, Embase, Lilacs, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and references from relevant articles. Articles in any language published with an English abstract, were screened, and those selected for inclusion were written in English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese or Spanish. The quality of the trials was assessed by the Delphi list. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA® software.Results:A significant improvement in all signs and symptoms, except photophobia, was observed after topical treatment for active VKC, independent of the type of treatment. Comparison of the efficacy of different drugs was not possible due to a lack of standardised criteria among studies.Conclusion:The currently available topical drugs are effective in treating acute phases of VKC. However, there is a lack of evidence to support the recommendation of one specific type of medication for treating this disorder. There is a need for standard criteria to assess diagnosis and therapy based on severity. There is also a need for RCTs assessing long-term effects of single drugs to control the disease and to prevent complications.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-NRGHTDDX-W
PMID:17588996
istex:786886931A7C8CA272B13A2F33A9DED614E11A8E
href:bjophthalmol-91-1656.pdf
local:bjophthalmol;91/12/1656
ArticleID:bj122044
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjo.2007.122044