Ranibizumab (Lucentis) versus bevacizumab (Avastin): modelling cost effectiveness

Two new drugs provide startling benefits in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The clinical and cost effectiveness of ranibizumab (Lucentis) was compared to that of bevacizumab (Avastin), which costs up to 100 times less. A cost effectiveness model was developed to assess the c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of ophthalmology Vol. 91; no. 9; pp. 1244 - 1246
Main Authors Raftery, James, Clegg, Andrew, Jones, Jeremy, Tan, Seng Chuen, Lotery, Andrew
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.09.2007
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Two new drugs provide startling benefits in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The clinical and cost effectiveness of ranibizumab (Lucentis) was compared to that of bevacizumab (Avastin), which costs up to 100 times less. A cost effectiveness model was developed to assess the cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) over 10 years. For predominantly classic AMD, the efficacy of bevacizumab relative to ranibizumab would have to be around 40% for the latter to achieve £30k per QALY, a NICE threshold. Similar but worse results applied to the other main forms of AMD, minimally occult and occult with no classic lesions. The price of ranibizumab would have to be drastically reduced for it to be cost effective. Continued unlicensed use of bevacizumab raises ethical, legal and policy questions. Public pressure may be the most potent weapon in persuading Genentech to license bevacizumab for AMD.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-ZBVTL6CP-L
istex:49319A14E78D8EB2EC6DE6060AFE8C7758C33079
ArticleID:bj116616
PMID:17431015
href:bjophthalmol-91-1244.pdf
local:bjophthalmol;91/9/1244
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjo.2007.116616