Rectal sensorimotor dysfunction in patients with urge faecal incontinence: evidence from prolonged manometric studies

Background and aims: Although external anal sphincter dysfunction is the major cause of urge faecal incontinence, approximately 50% of such patients have evidence of rectal hypersensitivity and report exaggerated stool frequency and urgency. The contribution of rectosigmoid contractile activity to t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut Vol. 54; no. 9; pp. 1263 - 1272
Main Authors Chan, C L H, Lunniss, P J, Wang, D, Williams, N S, Scott, S M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology 01.09.2005
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and aims: Although external anal sphincter dysfunction is the major cause of urge faecal incontinence, approximately 50% of such patients have evidence of rectal hypersensitivity and report exaggerated stool frequency and urgency. The contribution of rectosigmoid contractile activity to the pathophysiology of this condition is unclear, and thus the relations between symptoms, rectal sensation, and rectosigmoid motor function were investigated. Methods: Fifty two consecutive patients with urge faecal incontinence, referred to a tertiary surgical centre, and 24 volunteers, underwent comprehensive anorectal physiological investigation, including prolonged rectosigmoid manometry. Patients were classified on the basis of balloon distension thresholds into those with rectal hypersensitivity (n = 27) and those with normal rectal sensation (n = 25). Automated quantitative analysis of overall rectosigmoid contractile activities and, specifically, high amplitude contractions and rectal motor complex activity was performed. Results: External anal sphincter dysfunction was similar in both patient groups. Overall, phasic activity and high amplitude contraction frequency were greater, and rectal motor complex variables significantly altered, in those with rectal hypersensitivity. Symptoms, more prevalent in the rectal hypersensitivity group, were also more often associated with rectosigmoid contractile events. For individuals, reduced compliance and increased rectal motor complex frequency were only observed in patients with rectal hypersensitivity. Conclusions: We have identified a subset of patients with urge faecal incontinence—namely, those with rectal hypersensitivity—who demonstrated increased symptoms, enhanced perception, reduced compliance, and exaggerated rectosigmoid motor activity. Comprehensive assessment of rectosigmoid sensorimotor function, in addition to evaluation of anal function, should be considered in the investigation of patients with urge faecal incontinence.
Bibliography:href:gutjnl-54-1263.pdf
local:0541263
ark:/67375/NVC-D6CW98W7-1
Correspondence to:
 Dr S M Scott
 Centre for Academic Surgery, GI Physiology Unit, 3rd Floor Alexandra Wing, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB, UK; m.scott@qmul.ac.uk
istex:965257F59F88902EE65A58ED39325F83A92104ED
PMID:15914573
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Published online first 24 May 2005
Conflict of interest: None declared.
This work was presented at the 19th International Symposium on Gastrointestinal Motility, Barcelona, Spain, 5–8 October 2003, and has been previously published in abstract form (Scott M et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2003:15:648)
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
DOI:10.1136/gut.2005.071613