Has FDA abandoned its efforts to make fake-cigar cigarettes comply with federal tobacco control laws that apply to cigarettes but not cigars?
In the USA, legal definitions of cigarettes and cigars are critical to tobacco control policy because federal, state and local laws typically tax and regulate cigarettes more strictly than cigars. In 2016, near the end of the Obama Administration, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent warni...
Saved in:
Published in | Tobacco control Vol. 29; no. 6; pp. 606 - 611 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BMJ
01.11.2020
BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In the USA, legal definitions of cigarettes and cigars are critical to tobacco control policy because federal, state and local laws typically tax and regulate cigarettes more strictly than cigars. In 2016, near the end of the Obama Administration, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent warning letters to four filtered ‘little cigar’ manufacturers stating that their so-called ‘cigars’ were cigarettes and, therefore, subject to more stringent public health restrictions. Documents produced in response to a Freedom of Information Act request show that without explanation or public notice FDA has abandoned its prior determination that the manufacturers’ ‘little cigars’ were actually cigarettes and, consequently, were violating the ban on flavoured cigarettes in the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (TCA). The documents also present the manufacturers’ arguments against FDA’s original position. However, those industry arguments are inconsistent with the research, other evidence and legal analysis indicating that filtered ‘little cigars’ meet the legal definition of cigarettes under the TCA and other similar federal, state and local definitions. To protect the public health, FDA must renew its efforts to ensure that these filtered ‘little cigars’ do not continue to evade compliance with the many important restrictions and requirements that apply to cigarettes but not cigars. Other government regulatory and tax-collection agencies with similar definitions need to follow suit. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Contributors No substantive contributions to the paper were made by anyone other than the four listed authors. The four informally discussed the paper and what it would contain. ENL wrote the initial draft which the others reviewed, leading to numerous additions and revisions, followed by several more rounds of redrafting, comments and revisions from all four until all agreed that the final draft was accurate, complete and ready for submission. Upon receiving the revise and resubmit with comments from reviewers and the subsequent request for final changes, the same basic process repeated to produce the revised draft and then the final draft. |
ISSN: | 0964-4563 1468-3318 1468-3318 |
DOI: | 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055395 |