Validation of the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and European League Against Rheumatism response criteria based on C-reactive protein against disease progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and comparison with the DAS28 based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate

Objective:To validate and compare the definition of the Disease Activity Score 28 based on C-reactive protein (DAS28 (CRP)) to the definition based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).Methods:Data were analysed from two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of abatacept of 6-month...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of the rheumatic diseases Vol. 68; no. 6; pp. 954 - 960
Main Authors Wells, G, Becker, J-C, Teng, J, Dougados, M, Schiff, M, Smolen, J, Aletaha, D, van Riel, P L C M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism 01.06.2009
BMJ Publishing Group
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
SeriesExtended report
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective:To validate and compare the definition of the Disease Activity Score 28 based on C-reactive protein (DAS28 (CRP)) to the definition based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).Methods:Data were analysed from two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of abatacept of 6-month and 12-month duration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria and the proportion of patients in remission (DAS28 <2.6) based on the two DAS28 definitions were examined. Trends in radiographic progression (erosion score, joint space narrowing score and total score) and physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)) across the EULAR responder states (none, moderate and good) were analysed.Results:There was general agreement in determining the EULAR responder state using both DAS28 definitions (κ = 0.80, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.83). Overall, there was 82.4% agreement on the EULAR response criteria; when disagreements occurred, the DAS28 (CRP) yielded a better EULAR response more often then DAS28 (ESR) (12.6% vs 4.9%, respectively). There was also agreement in determining remission: κ = 0.69 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.78). Radiographic progression decreased in patients treated with abatacept across EULAR states (from none to moderate to good) based on both definitions. For patients treated with placebo, the trend was not as pronounced, with radiographic scores higher for moderate vs non-responders. For physical function, similar trends were observed across the EULAR states for both DAS28 definitions.Conclusions:The DAS28 (CRP) has been validated against radiographic progression and physical function. While the DAS28 (CRP) yielded a better EULAR response more often than the DAS28 (ESR), the validation profile was similar to the DAS28 (ESR), indicating that both measures are useful for assessing disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Bibliography:istex:26599F90772E6F684E88C81B5AF5A20EF25B584E
href:annrheumdis-68-954.pdf
ArticleID:ar84459
ark:/67375/NVC-KDRX2F12-Z
PMID:18490431
local:annrheumdis;68/6/954
ISSN:0003-4967
1468-2060
DOI:10.1136/ard.2007.084459