Double blind, randomised study of continuous terbinafine compared with intermittent itraconazole in treatment of toenail onychomycosis

Abstract Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of continuous terbinafine with intermittent itraconazole in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. Design: Prospective, randomised, double blind, double dummy, multicentre, parallel group study lasting 72 weeks. Setting:35 centres in six Europe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ Vol. 318; no. 7190; pp. 1031 - 1035
Main Authors Evans, E Glyn V, Sigurgeirsson, Bárdur
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London British Medical Journal Publishing Group 17.04.1999
British Medical Association
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
British Medical Journal
EditionInternational edition
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of continuous terbinafine with intermittent itraconazole in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. Design: Prospective, randomised, double blind, double dummy, multicentre, parallel group study lasting 72 weeks. Setting:35 centres in six European countries. Subjects: 496 patients aged 18 to 75 years with a clinical and mycological diagnosis of dermatophyte onychomycosis of the toenail. Interventions: Study patients were randomly divided into four parallel groups to receive either terbinafine 250 mg a day for 12 or 16 weeks (groups T12 and T16or itraconazole 400 mg a day for 1 week in every 4 weeks for 12 or 16 weeks (groups I and I). Main outcome measures: Assessment of primary efficacy at week 72 was mycological cure, defined as negative results on microscopy and culture of samples from the target toenail. Results: At week 72 the mycological cure rates were 75.7% (81/107) in the T12 group and 80.8% (80/99) in theT16 group compared with 38.3% (41/107) in theI group and 49.1 % (53/108) in the I4 group.All comparisons (T v I,T12 vI4, T16v I3, T16 vI4) showed significantly higher cure rates in the terbinafine groups (all P<0.0001). Also, all secondary clinical outcome measures were significantly in favour of terbinafine at week72. There were no differences in the number or type of adverse events recorded in the terbinafine or itraconazole groups. Conclusion: Continuous terbinafine is significantly more effective than intermittent itraconazole in the treatment of patients with toenail onychomycosis.
Bibliography:Correspondence to: Professor Evans
istex:A2D709D6DD5166D5187B5C2C2D0CBB4B2581ECFD
href:bmj-318-1031.pdf
PMID:10205099
local:bmj;318/7190/1031
ark:/67375/NVC-FGT8TD01-M
Correspondence to: Professor Evans E.G.V.Evans@leeds.ac.uk
Contributors: EGVE assisted with the planning of the study, was responsible for all the mycological investigations, helped with the interpretation of the results, and was principally responsible for writing and revising the paper. BS was the principal study investigator and as such assisted with the planning of the study and was responsible for the final content of the protocol. BS also made a major contribution to the clinical work of the study, helped with the interpretation of the results, and assisted with writing and revising the paper. Both authors are guarantors.
ISSN:0959-8138
0959-8146
1468-5833
1756-1833
DOI:10.1136/bmj.318.7190.1031