Combined use of Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism and IS6110-RFLP in fingerprinting clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Kerala, South India

• Published in: BMC infectious diseases Vol. 7; no. 1; p. 86
• Main Authors: Krishnan, Manju Y, Radhakrishnan, Indulakshmi, Joseph, Biljo V, Madhavi Latha, G K, Ajay Kumar, R, Mundayoor, Sathish
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 28.07.2007; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Cluster Analysis; DNA Fingerprinting - methods; DNA Transposable Elements - genetics; DNA, Bacterial - analysis; DNA, Bacterial - genetics; Humans; India; Mycobacterium tuberculosis - classification; Mycobacterium tuberculosis - genetics; Mycobacterium tuberculosis - isolation & purification; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques - methods; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length; Reproducibility of Results; Tuberculosis - microbiology; India
• ISSN: 1471-2334; 1471-2334
• DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-86

DNA fingerprinting by IS6110-RFLP has shown a high incidence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates having no and low copies of the insertion sequence in Kerala, South India. Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) would scan the entire genome rather than a few repetitive elements, we thought that this technique would help us in differentiating the large reservoir of isolates from an endemic region. Here we evaluate the ability of Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) to type clinical isolates. Fifty clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis were analysed by conventional radioactive AFLP and IS6110- RFLP. M. bovis, M. bovis BCG and two non tuberculous mycobacteria were also analysed to see species specific differences generated by AFLP. Cluster analysis was performed using the AFLP profile that showed the maximum polymorphism within M. tuberculosis and this was compared to the number of copies of IS6110 insertions. For AFLP, out of ten primer pairs tested, the EO/MC pair generated maximum polymorphism among the clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis. The similarity between the isolates ranged between 88 and 99.5%. Majority (nearly 85%) of the 'low copy' IS6110 isolates clustered together, while the rest clustered irrespective of the copy numbers. AFLP could show rare differences between isolates of M. tuberculosis, M. bovis and M. bovis BCG. The AFLP profiles for non-tuberculous mycobacteria were highly different from those of M. tuberculosis. Polymorphism generated by AFLP within the M. tuberculosis species is limited and hence AFLP alone seems to have limited use in fingerprinting the isolates in Kerala. The combined use of AFLP and IS6110-RFLP showed relatively better differentiation of 'high copy' IS6110 isolates, but failed to differentiate the 'low copy' isolates. However, the technique may be efficient in inter-species differentiation, and hence potentially useful in identifying and developing species-specific markers.