VF-14 item specific responses in patients undergoing first eye cataract surgery: can the length of the VF-14 be reduced?

Aims: To report the item specific responses of the VF-14 in a population of patients undergoing cataract surgery in their first eye and to determine whether or not the VF-14 can be reduced without compromising its performance as an index of cataract related visual impairment. Methods: The item speci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of ophthalmology Vol. 86; no. 8; pp. 885 - 891
Main Authors Friedman, D S, Tielsch, J M, Vitale, S, Bass, E B, Schein, O D, Steinberg, E P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.08.2002
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Copyright 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aims: To report the item specific responses of the VF-14 in a population of patients undergoing cataract surgery in their first eye and to determine whether or not the VF-14 can be reduced without compromising its performance as an index of cataract related visual impairment. Methods: The item specific responses to the VF-14 were analysed before (771 patients) and 4 months after (552 patients) cataract surgery in one eye to determine if the VF-14 index can be reduced without compromising its performance. Patients studied were selected from a cross sectional longitudinal study of patients undergoing cataract surgery in 72 ophthalmologist's offices located in three metropolitan regions of the United States. Results: Pairwise correlations between items in the VF-14 were all less than 0.6, indicating that no items could be removed solely on the basis of redundancy. 10 items correlated moderately with change in trouble, and 11 correlated moderately with change in satisfaction (r >0.15) at 4 months after cataract extraction. Eleven items demonstrated an effect size >0.4 at 4 months. These 11 items were either important for detecting cataract related functional disability or for quantifying the extent to which cataract impaired function. Additionally, 11 items were needed to detect adequately individuals with functional impairment. Three items (recognising people, cooking, and reading large print) were less responsive to cataract extraction and were more strongly associated with ocular comorbidities. Conclusions: While previous reports indicate that the VF-14 can be significantly shortened, our analysis only justifies removing three items. While the resulting VF-11 has properties similar to the VF-14, the limited time savings do not justify altering this already validated instrument.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/NVC-79PVSJW4-F
PMID:12140210
local:0860885
href:bjophthalmol-86-885.pdf
istex:8BED1EF617F1968E4E27386DD7A3EF19CE93EDEC
Correspondence to: David S Friedman, MD, MPH, Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer 120, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; David.Friedman@jhu.edu
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Correspondence to: …David S Friedman, MD, MPH, Dana Center for Preventive Ophthalmology, Wilmer 120, Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; …David.Friedman@jhu.edu
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjo.86.8.885