Integrated health service delivery during COVID-19: a scoping review of published evidence from low-income and lower-middle-income countries

• Published in: BMJ global health Vol. 6; no. 6; p. e005667
• Main Authors: Hasan, Md Zabir, Neill, Rachel, Das, Priyanka, Venugopal, Vasuki, Arora, Dinesh, Bishai, David, Jain, Nishant, Gupta, Shivam
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.06.2021; BMJ Publishing Group
• Subjects: Acquired immune deficiency syndrome; AIDS; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Epidemics; Health administration; Health care policy; Health services; Health surveillance; HIV; Horizontal integration; Human immunodeficiency virus; Income; Industrialized nations; Integrated delivery systems; Original Research; Pandemics; Protocol; Public health; United States > US; Vietnam; India
• ISSN: 2059-7908; 2059-7908
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005667

BackgroundIntegrated health service delivery (IHSD) is a promising approach to improve health system resilience. However, there is a lack of evidence specific to the low/lower-middle-income country (L-LMIC) health systems on how IHSD is used during disease outbreaks. This scoping review aimed to synthesise the emerging evidence on IHSD approaches adopted in L-LMIC during the COVID-19 pandemic and systematically collate their operational features.MethodsA systematic scoping review of peer-reviewed literature, published in English between 1 December 2019 and 12 June 2020, from seven electronic databases was conducted to explore the evidence of IHSD implemented in L-LMICs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were systematically charted, and key features of IHSD systems were presented according to the postulated research questions of the review.ResultsThe literature search retrieved 1487 published articles from which 18 articles met the inclusion criteria and included in this review. Service delivery, health workforce, medicine and technologies were the three most frequently integrated health system building blocks during the COVID-19 pandemic. While responding to COVID-19, the L-LMICs principally implemented the IHSD system via systematic horizontal integration, led by specific policy measures. The government’s stewardship, along with the decentralised decision-making capacity of local institutions and multisectoral collaboration, was the critical facilitator for IHSD. Simultaneously, fragmented service delivery structures, fragile supply chain, inadequate diagnostic capacity and insufficient workforce were key barriers towards integration.ConclusionA wide array of context-specific IHSD approaches were operationalised in L-LMICs during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging recommendations emphasise the importance of coordination and integration across building blocks and levels of the health system, supported by a responsive governance structure and stakeholder engagement strategies. Future reviews can revisit this emerging evidence base at subsequent phases of COVID-19 response and recovery in L-LMICs to understand how the approaches highlighted here evolve.