Effect of omeprazole and sucralfate on prepyloric gastric ulcer. A double blind comparative trial and one year follow up

This study compared healing rates, relief of symptoms, frequency of adverse events, and proportion of patients in remission after one year follow up in 104 patients with active prepyloric ulcer during treatment with 40 mg omeprazole once daily or 2 g sucralfate twice daily, using a randomised double...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut Vol. 35; no. 6; pp. 837 - 840
Main Authors Sørensen, H T, Rasmussen, H H, Balslev, I, Boesby, S, Boné, J, Kruse, A, Rasmussen, S N
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology 01.06.1994
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study compared healing rates, relief of symptoms, frequency of adverse events, and proportion of patients in remission after one year follow up in 104 patients with active prepyloric ulcer during treatment with 40 mg omeprazole once daily or 2 g sucralfate twice daily, using a randomised double blind controlled trial. Healing rates after two, four, and six weeks were (omeprazole/sucralfate) 49%/23%; 83%/59%; 90%/70% respectively. After two weeks, omeprazole was more efficient than sucralfate in relief of daytime and nocturnal epigastric pain, nausea, and heartburn. The proportion of patients in remission after one year follow up was significantly higher in the omeprazole group (p < 0.01). Of the healed patients ulcers recurred in 36% in the omeprazole group and in 46% in the sucralfate group. It is concluded that the ulcer healing rate was higher and symptom relief was more pronounced in the omeprazole group compared with the sucralfate group, and that more patients were still in remission after a one year follow up period.
Bibliography:istex:C7AD010F0BDDBC1CF6C5E0FFD6D7F4B02C58B81F
PMID:8020815
href:gutjnl-35-837.pdf
local:gutjnl;35/6/837
ark:/67375/NVC-9CFNGB0M-Q
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0017-5749
1468-3288
1458-3288
DOI:10.1136/gut.35.6.837