Uterine balloon tamponade as an adjunct to misoprostol for the treatment of uncontrolled postpartum haemorrhage: a randomised controlled trial in Benin and Mali

ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of low-cost uterine tamponade as an adjunct to misoprostol for the treatment of uncontrolled postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in low-resource settings.DesignRandomised controlled trial.SettingSeven healthcare facilities in Cotonou, Benin and Bamako, Mali.PopulationWo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ open Vol. 7; no. 9; p. e016590
Main Authors Dumont, Alexandre, Bodin, Cécile, Hounkpatin, Benjamin, Popowski, Thomas, Traoré, Mamadou, Perrin, René, Rozenberg, Patrick
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.09.2017
BMJ Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of low-cost uterine tamponade as an adjunct to misoprostol for the treatment of uncontrolled postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in low-resource settings.DesignRandomised controlled trial.SettingSeven healthcare facilities in Cotonou, Benin and Bamako, Mali.PopulationWomen delivering vaginally who had clinically diagnosed PPH that was suspected to be due to uterine atony, who were unresponsive to oxytocin and who needed additional uterotonics.MethodsWomen were randomly assigned to receive uterine balloon tamponade with a condom-catheter device or no tamponade; both groups were also given intrarectal or sublingual misoprostol.Main outcome measureProportion of women with invasive surgery or who died before hospital discharge.ResultsThe proportion of primary composite outcome did not differ significantly between the tamponade arm (16%; 9/57) and the standard second line treatment arm (7%; 4/59): relative risk 2.33 (95% CI 0.76 to 7.14, p=0.238). A significantly increased proportion of women with tamponade and misoprostol versus misoprostol alone had total blood loss more than 1000 mL: relative risk 1.52 (95% CI 1.15 to 2.00, p=0.01). Case fatality rate was higher in the tamponade group (10%; 6/57) than in the control group (2%; 1/59) (p=0.059).Trial registration numberISRCT Registry Number 01202389; Post-results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC5589006
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016590