Triple procedure; analysis of outcome, refraction, and intraocular lens power calculation

AIMS A total of 97 triple procedures performed over a 6 year period were studied retrospectively to determine the best approach to calculate intraocular lens power. METHODS The cases were divided into two diagnostic categories. RESULTS After 1 year best corrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of ophthalmology Vol. 81; no. 9; pp. 774 - 777
Main Authors Geerards, Annette J M, Hassmann, Elissa, Beekhuis, W Houdijn, Remeyer, L, van Rij, Gabriel, Rijneveld, Wilhelmina J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.09.1997
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIMS A total of 97 triple procedures performed over a 6 year period were studied retrospectively to determine the best approach to calculate intraocular lens power. METHODS The cases were divided into two diagnostic categories. RESULTS After 1 year best corrected visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 37.5% of the cases of the ‘modified group’. This group consists of patients with the diagnosis Fuchs’ dystrophy, non-guttate endothelial dystrophy, and Reis–Buckler dystrophy. Analysis of visual acuity was made using logMAR. A final postoperative refraction within 2 dioptres of predicted refraction was achieved in 76.5% of patients in the modified group. CONCLUSION In future, in the absence of a keratometry, a keratometry value of 7.49 mm will be used for calculation of the power of the implant as analysed in this study.
Bibliography:Annette J M Geerards, MD, The Rotterdam Eye Hospital PO Box 70030, 3000 LM Rotterdam, Netherlands.
local:bjophthalmol;81/9/774
PMID:9422932
istex:689A51DA09422D6F44B22947B3FDB52A6B31CF87
ark:/67375/NVC-1H200MQN-9
href:bjophthalmol-81-774.pdf
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjo.81.9.774