Ultrasound assessment of normal hemidiaphragmatic movement: relation to inspiratory volume

• Published in: Thorax Vol. 49; no. 5; pp. 500 - 503
• Main Authors: Houston, J G, Angus, R M, Cowan, M D, McMillan, N C, Thomson, N C
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society 01.05.1994; BMJ; BMJ Publishing Group LTD
• Subjects: Adult; Air Pressure; Biological and medical sciences; Diaphragm - diagnostic imaging; Diaphragm - physiology; Female; Humans; Inhalation - physiology; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Lung - anatomy & histology; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Miscellaneous. Technology; Mouth - physiology; Movement - physiology; Posture - physiology; Reference Values; Spirometry; Ultrasonic investigative techniques; Ultrasonography; Sonography; Human; Lung volume; Inspiration; Motion; Correlation; Respiratory muscle; Echography; Exploration; Diaphragm; Respiratory system
• ISSN: 0040-6376; 1468-3296
• DOI: 10.1136/thx.49.5.500

BACKGROUND--Traditionally the radiological assessment of diaphragmatic movement has relied on fluoroscopy. Ultrasound scanning has recently been shown to be a sensitive and reproducible method of assessing hemidiaphragmatic movement in normal subjects. A study was undertaken to examine how movement of the diaphragm measured by ultrasound scanning relates to inspired lung volumes measured by spirometric testing. METHODS--Ultrasound examinations were performed on 14 normal volunteers using a 3.5 MHz sector transducer (Acuson 128). A fixed skin position on each lateral chest wall between the anterior clavicular and midaxillary line was selected symmetrically to obtain a longitudinal plane of each hemidiaphragm including the maximal renal bipolar length, allowing identification of the adjacent posterior aspect of the diaphragm. Craniocaudal excursions of the posterior part of each hemidiaphragm on successive respiratory cycles were recorded on videotape and compared with spirometric measurements recorded simultaneously on a water bath spirometer. Measurements were made in the sitting and supine position and were repeated on a separate occasion (at least two weeks apart) in 10 subjects by the same operator to assess reproducibility. RESULTS--The relation between inspired volume and hemidiaphragmatic movement was found to be linear. The gradient of these observed linear relations (hemidiaphragmatic excursion (mm)/inspired volume (1)) was calculated and their distribution for each hemidiaphragm followed a normal distribution irrespective of position. The 95% confidence limits of the right to left ratio of these gradients in the supine position were 0.53 and 1.7. Change of posture from the supine to the sitting position reduced the gradient. The technique had acceptable reproducibility with coefficients of variation for the supine position of 7.5% and 11.7% for right and left hemidiaphragm respectively. CONCLUSION--Ultrasound scanning is a simple, non-invasive and reproducible means of assessing hemidiaphragmatic movement, yielding quantitative information which relates to inspired lung volumes.