Blood–brain barrier destruction determines Fisher/Bickerstaff clinical phenotypes: an in vitro study
Objective To ascertain the hypothesis that the phenotypic differences between Bickerstaff's brainstem encephalitis (BBE) and Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) are derived from the differences in the effects of sera on blood–brain barrier (BBB) and blood–nerve barrier. Background Antibodies against G...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry Vol. 84; no. 7; pp. 756 - 765 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
01.07.2013
BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective To ascertain the hypothesis that the phenotypic differences between Bickerstaff's brainstem encephalitis (BBE) and Miller Fisher syndrome (MFS) are derived from the differences in the effects of sera on blood–brain barrier (BBB) and blood–nerve barrier. Background Antibodies against GQ1b are frequently detected in BBE and MFS, and these two disorders may share the same pathogenesis, but the clinical phenotypes of BBE and MFS are substantially different. Methods The effects of sera obtained from BBE patients, MFS patients and control subjects were evaluated with regard to the expression of tight junction proteins and transendothelial electrical resistance in human brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) and human peripheral nerve microvascular endothelial cells. Results The sera obtained from BBE patients decreased the transendothelial electrical resistance values and claudin-5 protein expression in BMECs, although the sera obtained from MFS patients had no effect on BMECs or peripheral nerve microvascular endothelial cells. This effect was reversed after the application of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor, GM6001. The presence or absence of anti-GQ1b antibodies did not significantly influence the results. MMP-9 secreted by BMECs was significantly increased after exposure to the sera obtained from BBE patients, whereas it was not changed after exposure to the sera obtained from MFS patients. Conclusions Only the sera obtained from BBE patients destroyed BBB and it might explain the phenotypical differences between BBE and MFS. BBE sera disrupted BBB, possibly via the autocrine secretion of MMP-9 from BBB-composing endothelial cells. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | PMID:23584494 local:jnnp;84/7/756 href:jnnp-84-756.pdf related-article-ID:RA1 istex:BC710E1DD826AB6B15554190AF1BB748CBB2384A ark:/67375/NVC-SR6GFTK3-S ArticleID:jnnp-2012-304306 Related-article-href:10.1136/jnnp-2012-304655 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
ISSN: | 0022-3050 1468-330X 1468-330X |
DOI: | 10.1136/jnnp-2012-304306 |