Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms and risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children

• Published in: Indian journal of cancer Vol. 47; no. 1; p. 40
• Main Authors: Sadananda Adiga, M. N, Chandy, S, Ramachandra, N, Appaji, L, Aruna Kumari, B. S, Ramaswamy, G, Savithri, H. S, Krishnamoorthy, L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: India Medknow Publications on behalf of Indian Cancer Society 01.01.2010; Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd; Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd
• Subjects: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Acute lymphocytic leukemia; Adolescent; Case-Control Studies; Child; Child, Preschool; Children; Enzymes; Female; gene polymorphisms; Genetic aspects; Genetic polymorphisms; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Health aspects; Humans; Male; Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2) - genetics; Physiological aspects; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma - enzymology; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma - genetics; Reorganization and restructuring; Risk Factors; India
• ISSN: 0019-509X; 1998-4774
• DOI: 10.4103/0019-509X.58858

Introduction: Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a critical enzyme in folate metabolism and is involved in DNA synthesis, DNA repair and DNA methylation. Genetic polymorphisms of this enzyme have been shown to impact several diseases, including cancer. Leukemias are malignancies arising from rapidly proliferating hematopoietic cells having great requirement of DNA synthesis. This case-control study was undertaken to analyze the association of the MTHFR gene polymorphisms 677 C"T and 1298 A"C and the risk of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. Materials and Methods: Eighty-six patients aged below 15 years with a confirmed diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 99 matched controls were taken for this study. Analysis of the polymorphisms was done using the polymerase chain reaction -restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. Results: Frequency of MTHFR 677 CC and CT were 85.9% and 14.1% in the controls, and 84.9% and 15.1% in the cases. The ′T′ allele frequency was 7% and 7.5% in cases and controls respectively. The frequency of MTHFR 1298 AA, AC, and CC were 28.3%, 55.6% and 16.1% for controls and 23.3%, 59.3% and 17.4% for cases respectively. The ′C′ allele frequency for 1298 A→C was 43.9% and 47% respectively for controls and cases. The odds ratio (OR) for C677T was 1.08 (95% CI 0.48- 2.45, p = 0.851) and OR for A1298C was 1.29(95% CI 0.65-2.29, p = 0.46) and OR for 1298 CC was 1.31 (95% CI 0.53-3.26, p =0.56). The OR for the combined heterozygous status (677 CT and 1298 AC) was 1.94 (95% CI 0.58 -6.52, p = 0.286). Conclusion: The prevalence of ′T′ allele for 677 MTHFR polymorphism was low in the population studied. There was no association between MTHFR 677 C→T and 1298 A→C gene polymorphisms and risk of ALL, which may be due to the small sample size.