Impact of personal protective equipment on the clarity of vision among trachoma survey graders and trichiasis surgeons in the context of COVID-19

Background/aimsThe COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the use of personal protective equipment for those involved in trachoma survey grading and trichiasis surgery. We sought to determine which configuration of a face shield would be less likely to impact grading accuracy and ability to conduct trichias...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ open ophthalmology Vol. 8; no. 1; p. e001255
Main Authors Ul Hassan, Ehtisham, Apadinuwe, Sue-Chen, Bisanzio, Donal, Dejene, Michael, Downs, Philip, Harding-Esch, Emma M, Jimenez, Cristina, Kabona, George, Kebede, Biruck Negash, Kelly, Michaela, Kivumbi, Peter, Millar, Tom, Mosher, Aryc W, Mpyet, Caleb, Mkocha, Harran, Ngondi, Jeremiah M, Olobio, Nicholas, Palmer, Stephanie, Teyil, Wamyil-Mshelia, Courtright, Paul
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.06.2023
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
SeriesOriginal research
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background/aimsThe COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the use of personal protective equipment for those involved in trachoma survey grading and trichiasis surgery. We sought to determine which configuration of a face shield would be less likely to impact grading accuracy and ability to conduct trichiasis surgery. The research also included assessment of comfort, ease of cleaning and robustness.MethodsThere were three research phases. In phase 1, assessment of four potential face shield configurations was undertaken with principal trachoma graders and trichiasis surgeon trainers to decide which two options should undergo further testing. In phase 2, clarity of vision and comfort (in a classroom environment) of the two configurations were assessed compared with no face shield (control), while grading trachomatous inflammation—follicular (TF). The second phase also included the assessment of impact of the configurations while performing trichiasis surgery using a training model. In phase 3, face shield ease of use was evaluated during routine surgical programmes.ResultsIn phase 2, 124 trachoma graders and 28 trichiasis surgeons evaluated the 2 face shield configurations selected in phase 1. TF agreement was high (kappa=0.83 and 0.82) for both configurations compared with not wearing a face shield. Comfort was reported as good by 51% and 32% of graders using the two configurations. Trichiasis skill scores were similar for both configurations.ConclusionThe face shield configuration that includes a cut-out for mounting the 2.5× magnifying loupes does not appear to impact the ability or comfort of trachoma graders or trichiasis surgeons to carry out their work.
Bibliography:Original research
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2397-3269
2397-3269
DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001255