Phase II study of ketogenic diets in relapsing multiple sclerosis: safety, tolerability and potential clinical benefits

BackgroundDietary changes impact human physiology and immune function and have potential as therapeutic strategies.ObjectiveAssess the tolerability of a ketogenic diet (KD) in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) and define the impact on laboratory and clinical outcome metrics.MethodsSixt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry Vol. 93; no. 6; pp. 637 - 644
Main Authors Brenton, J Nicholas, Lehner-Gulotta, Diana, Woolbright, Emma, Banwell, Brenda, Bergqvist, A G Christina, Chen, Shanshan, Coleman, Rachael, Conaway, Mark, Goldman, Myla D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.06.2022
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundDietary changes impact human physiology and immune function and have potential as therapeutic strategies.ObjectiveAssess the tolerability of a ketogenic diet (KD) in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) and define the impact on laboratory and clinical outcome metrics.MethodsSixty-five subjects with relapsing MS enrolled into a 6-month prospective, intention-to-treat KD intervention. Adherence was monitored with daily urine ketone testing. At baseline, fatigue, depression and quality of life (QoL) scores were obtained in addition to fasting adipokines and MS-related clinical outcome metrics. Baseline metrics were repeated at 3 and/or 6 months on-diet.ResultsEighty-three percent of participants adhered to the KD for the study duration. Subjects exhibited significant reductions in fat mass and showed a nearly 50% decline in self-reported fatigue and depression scores. MS QoL physical health (67±16 vs 79±12, p<0.001) and mental health (71±17 vs 82±11, p<0.001) composite scores increased on-diet. Significant improvements were noted in Expanded Disability Status Scale scores (2.3±0.9 vs 1.9±1.1, p<0.001), 6-minute walk (1631±302 vs 1733±330 ft, p<0.001) and Nine-Hole Peg Test (21.5±3.6 vs 20.3±3.7 s, p<0.001). Serum leptin was lower (25.5±15.7 vs 14.0±11.7 ng/mL, p<0.001) and adiponectin was higher (11.4±7.8 vs 13.5±8.4 µg/mL, p=0.002) on the KD.ConclusionKDs are safe and tolerable over a 6-month study period and yield improvements in body composition, fatigue, depression, QoL, neurological disability and adipose-related inflammation in persons living with relapsing MS.Trial registration informationRegistered on ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT03718247, posted on 24 October 2018. First patient enrolment date: 1 November 2018. Link: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03718247?term=NCT03718247&draw=2&rank=1.
Bibliography:Original research
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Contributors JNB’s contributions included study concept and study design, acquisition of data, analyses and interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. JNB (guarantor) accepts full responsibility for the finished work and/or the conduct of the study, had access to the data, and controlled the decision to publish. DL-G’s contributions included acquisition of data, interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. EW’s contributions included acquisition of data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. BB’s contributions included study design, interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. AGCB’s contributions included study design, interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. SC’s contributions included interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. RC’s contributions included acquisition of data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. MC’s contributions included study design, interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. MDG’s contributions included study design, interpretation of data and critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.
ISSN:0022-3050
1468-330X
1468-330X
DOI:10.1136/jnnp-2022-329074