Failure of annexin-based apoptosis imaging in the assessment of antiangiogenic therapy effects

Background Molecular apoptosis imaging is frequently discussed to be useful for monitoring cancer therapy. We demonstrate that the sole assessment of therapy effects by apoptosis imaging can be misleading, depending on the therapy effect on the tumor vasculature. Methods Apoptosis was investigated b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEJNMMI research Vol. 1; no. 1; p. 26
Main Authors Lederle, Wiltrud, Arns, Susanne, Rix, Anne, Gremse, Felix, Doleschel, Dennis, Schmaljohann, Jörn, Mottaghy, Felix M, Kiessling, Fabian, Palmowski, Moritz
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 17.11.2011
BioMed Central Ltd
Springer
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Molecular apoptosis imaging is frequently discussed to be useful for monitoring cancer therapy. We demonstrate that the sole assessment of therapy effects by apoptosis imaging can be misleading, depending on the therapy effect on the tumor vasculature. Methods Apoptosis was investigated by determining the uptake of Annexin Vivo by optical imaging (study part I) and of 99 m Tc-6-hydrazinonicotinic [HYNIC]-radiolabeled Annexin V by gamma counting (study part II) in subcutaneous epidermoid carcinoma xenografts (A431) in nude mice after antiangiogenic treatment (SU11248). Optical imaging was performed by optical tomography (3D) and 2D reflectance imaging (control, n = 7; therapy, n = 6). Accumulation of the radioactive tracer was determined ex vivo (control, n = 5; therapy, n = 6). Tumor vascularization was investigated with an optical blood pool marker (study part I) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (both studies). Data were validated by immunohistology. Results A significantly higher apoptosis rate was detected in treated tumors by immunohistological terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling staining (area fraction: control, 0.023 ± 0.015%; therapy, 0.387 ± 0.105%; P < 0.001). However, both 2D reflectance imaging using Annexin Vivo (control, 13 ± 15 FI/cm 2 ; therapy, 11 ± 7 FI/cm 2 ) and gamma counting using 99 m Tc-HYNIC-Annexin V (tumor-to-muscle ratio control, 5.66 ± 1.46; therapy, 6.09 ± 1.40) failed in showing higher accumulation in treated tumors. Optical tomography even indicated higher probe accumulation in controls (control, 81.3 ± 73.7 pmol/cm 3 ; therapy, 27.5 ± 34.7 pmol/cm 3 ). Vascularization was strongly reduced after therapy, demonstrated by contrast-enhanced ultrasound, optical imaging, and immunohistology. Conclusions The failure of annexin-based apoptosis assessment in vivo can be explained by the significant breakdown of the vasculature after therapy, resulting in reduced probe/tracer delivery. This favors annexin-based apoptosis imaging only in therapies that do not severely interfere with the vasculature.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2191-219X
2191-219X
DOI:10.1186/2191-219X-1-26