Policy for controlling pain after surgery: effect of sequential changes in management

• Published in: BMJ Vol. 305; no. 6863; pp. 1187 - 1193
• Main Authors: Gould, T. H., Crosby, D. L., Harmer, M., Lloyd, S. M., Lunn, J. N., Rees, G. A., Roberts, D. E., Webster, J. A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 14.11.1992; British Medical Association; BMJ Publishing Group LTD
• Subjects: Acute pain; Algorithms; Analgesia; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics; Clinical Protocols; Data Collection; Hospital Units - organization & administration; Hospitals, University - organization & administration; Humans; Inspiration; Minor surgical procedures; Nurses; Organizational Policy; Pain; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative - etiology; Pain, Postoperative - prevention & control; Pain, Postoperative - therapy; Patient Care Team - organization & administration; Patient controlled analgesia; Postoperative pain; Surgical procedures
• ISSN: 0959-8138; 1468-5833; 1756-1833
• DOI: 10.1136/bmj.305.6863.1187

OBJECTIVE--To observe the effects of introducing an acute pain service to the general surgical wards of a large teaching hospital. DESIGN--A study in seven stages: (1) an audit of current hospital practice succeeded by the sequential introduction to the general surgical wards of (2) pain assessment charts; (3) an algorithm to allow more frequent use of intramuscular analgesia; (4) increased use of local anaesthetic techniques of wound infiltration and nerve blocks; (5) an information sheet for patients about postoperative pain; (6) the introduction of patient controlled analgesia; (7) a repeat audit of hospital practice. Data were collected on each patient 24 hours after operation. SETTING--University Hospital of Wales, which has both district general and tertiary referral functions. PATIENTS--2035 patients over nine months from all surgical specialties (excluding cardiac) at the hospital. General surgical operations were studied in detail and separated into major, intermediate, and minor for data collection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--A change in the median visual analogue pain scores 24 hours after surgery for pain during relaxation, pain on movement, and pain on deep inspiration at each stage of the study. RESULTS--There was a reduction in median visual analogue scores during the study. The median (95% confidence interval) scores for pain during relaxation decreased from 45 (34 to 53) in stage 1 to 16 (10 to 20) in stage 7 for major surgical procedures. Pain on movement decreased from 78 (66 to 80) to 46 (38 to 48), and pain on deep inspiration decreased from 64 (48 to 78) to 36 (31 to 38). The reductions in median scores for intermediate and minor operative procedures showed similar patterns. CONCLUSIONS--The introduction of an acute pain service to the general surgical wards led to considerable improvement in the level of postoperative pain as assessed by visual analogue scores. Simple techniques of regular pain assessment and the more frequent use of intramuscular analgesia as a result of using an algorithm were particularly effective.