Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation

• Published in: BMJ open Vol. 12; no. 1; p. e051513
• Main Authors: Meyenfeldt, Erik M. von, van Nassau, Femke, de Betue, Carlijn T I, Barberio, L, Schreurs, Wilhelmina H, Marres, Geertruid M H, Bonjer, H Jaap, Anema, Johannes
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 05.01.2022; BMJ Publishing Group LTD; BMJ Publishing Group
• Series: Original research
• Subjects: Catheters; Clinical outcomes; Costs; Electronic health records; Health care policy; Health insurance; Health Personnel; Humans; Interviews; Length of stay; Lung cancer; medical education & training; Medical records; Netherlands; organisational development; Patients; Perioperative care; protocols & guidelines; Qualitative Research; Recovery (Medical); respiratory tract tumours; Sociopolitical factors; Surgeons; Surgery; Teaching hospitals; Thoracic Surgery; Thoracic Surgical Procedures; Netherlands; protocols & guidelines; organisational development; qualitative research; respiratory tract tumours; thoracic surgery; medical education & training
• ISSN: 2044-6055; 2044-6055
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051513

ObjectivesThis study aims to elucidate determinants for succesful implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS) protocol for perioperative care for surgical lung cancer patients in the Netherlands.SettingLung cancer operations are performed in both academic and regional hospitals, either by cardiothoracic or general thoracic surgeons. Limiting the impact of these operations by optimising and standardising perioperative care with the ERATS protocol is thought to enable reduction in length of stay, complications and costs.ParticipantsA broad spectrum of stakeholders in perioperative care for patients with lung resection participated in this study, ranging from patient representatives, healthcare professionals to an insurance company representative.InterventionsSemistructured interviews (N=14) were conducted with the stakeholders (N=18). The interviews were conducted one on one by telephone and two times, face to face, in small groups. Verbatim transcriptions of these interviews were coded for the purpose of thematic analysis.Outcome measuresDeterminants for successful implementation of the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands.ResultsSeveral determinants correspond with previous publications: having a multidisciplinary team, leadership from a senior clinician and support from an ERAS-coordinator as facilitators; lack of feedback on performance and absence of management support as barriers. Our study underscores the potential detrimental effect of inconsistent communication, the lack of support in the transition from hospital to home and the barrier posed by lack of accessible audit data.ConclusionsBased on a structured problem analysis among a wide selection of stakeholders, this study provides a solid basis for choosing adequate implementation strategies to introduce the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands. Emphasis on consistent and sufficient communication, support in the transition from hospital to home and adequate audit and feedback data, in addition to established implementation strategies for ERAS-type programmes, will enable a tailored approach to implementation of ERATS in the Dutch context.