Web-based self-management support for people with type 2 diabetes (HeLP-Diabetes): randomised controlled trial in English primary care

ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of a web-based self-management programme for people with type 2 diabetes in improving glycaemic control and reducing diabetes-related distress.Methods and designIndividually randomised two-arm controlled trial.Setting21 general practices in England.Participant...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ open Vol. 7; no. 9; p. e016009
Main Authors Murray, Elizabeth, Sweeting, Michael, Dack, Charlotte, Pal, Kingshuk, Modrow, Kerstin, Hudda, Mohammed, Li, Jinshuo, Ross, Jamie, Alkhaldi, Ghadah, Barnard, Maria, Farmer, Andrew, Michie, Susan, Yardley, Lucy, May, Carl, Parrott, Steve, Stevenson, Fiona, Knox, Malcolm, Patterson, David
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.09.2017
BMJ Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of a web-based self-management programme for people with type 2 diabetes in improving glycaemic control and reducing diabetes-related distress.Methods and designIndividually randomised two-arm controlled trial.Setting21 general practices in England.ParticipantsAdults aged 18 or over with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes registered with participating general practices.Intervention and comparatorUsual care plus either Healthy Living for People with Diabetes (HeLP-Diabetes), an interactive, theoretically informed, web-based self-management programme or a simple, text-based website containing basic information only.Outcomes and data collectionJoint primary outcomes were glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and diabetes-related distress, measured by the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) scale, collected at 3 and 12 months after randomisation, with 12 months the primary outcome point. Research nurses, blind to allocation collected clinical data; participants completed self-report questionnaires online.AnalysisThe analysis compared groups as randomised (intention to treat) using a linear mixed effects model, adjusted for baseline data with multiple imputation of missing values.ResultsOf the 374 participants randomised between September 2013 and December 2014, 185 were allocated to the intervention and 189 to the control. Final (12 month) follow-up data for HbA1c were available for 318 (85%) and for PAID 337 (90%) of participants. Of these, 291 (78%) and 321 (86%) responses were recorded within the predefined window of 10–14 months. Participants in the intervention group had lower HbA1c than those in the control (mean difference −0.24%; 95% CI −0.44 to −0.049; p=0.014). There was no significant overall difference between groups in the mean PAID score (p=0.21), but prespecified subgroup analysis of participants who had been more recently diagnosed with diabetes showed a beneficial impact of the intervention in this group (p = 0.004). There were no reported harms.ConclusionsAccess to HeLP-Diabetes improved glycaemic control over 12 months.Trial registration numberISRCTN02123133.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016009