Life extension, overpopulation and the right to life: against lethal ethics

Some of the objections to life-extension stem from a concern with overpopulation. I will show that whether or not the overpopulation threat is realistic, arguments from overpopulation cannot ethically demand halting the quest for, nor access to, life-extension. The reason for this is that we have a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of medical ethics Vol. 34; no. 9; p. e7
Main Author Cutas, D E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics 01.09.2008
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Some of the objections to life-extension stem from a concern with overpopulation. I will show that whether or not the overpopulation threat is realistic, arguments from overpopulation cannot ethically demand halting the quest for, nor access to, life-extension. The reason for this is that we have a right to life, which entitles us not to have meaningful life denied to us against our will and which does not allow discrimination solely on the grounds of age. If the threat of overpopulation creates a rights conflict between the right to come into existence, the right to reproduce, the right to more opportunities and space (if, indeed, these rights can be successfully defended), and the right to life, the latter ought to be given precedence.
Bibliography:istex:A658865FF4F5492DFC04A80EE4549CB7B4673172
href:medethics-34-e7.pdf
ArticleID:me23622
PMID:18757626
local:medethics;34/9/e7
ark:/67375/NVC-1G9Q1XW0-S
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-6800
1473-4257
1473-4257
DOI:10.1136/jme.2007.023622