Life extension, overpopulation and the right to life: against lethal ethics
Some of the objections to life-extension stem from a concern with overpopulation. I will show that whether or not the overpopulation threat is realistic, arguments from overpopulation cannot ethically demand halting the quest for, nor access to, life-extension. The reason for this is that we have a...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of medical ethics Vol. 34; no. 9; p. e7 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics
01.09.2008
BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Some of the objections to life-extension stem from a concern with overpopulation. I will show that whether or not the overpopulation threat is realistic, arguments from overpopulation cannot ethically demand halting the quest for, nor access to, life-extension. The reason for this is that we have a right to life, which entitles us not to have meaningful life denied to us against our will and which does not allow discrimination solely on the grounds of age. If the threat of overpopulation creates a rights conflict between the right to come into existence, the right to reproduce, the right to more opportunities and space (if, indeed, these rights can be successfully defended), and the right to life, the latter ought to be given precedence. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:A658865FF4F5492DFC04A80EE4549CB7B4673172 href:medethics-34-e7.pdf ArticleID:me23622 PMID:18757626 local:medethics;34/9/e7 ark:/67375/NVC-1G9Q1XW0-S ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0306-6800 1473-4257 1473-4257 |
DOI: | 10.1136/jme.2007.023622 |