What are common barriers and helpful solutions to colorectal cancer screening? A cross-sectional survey to develop intervention content for a planning support tool

ObjectiveColorectal screening using faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) can save lives if the people invited participate. In Scotland, most people intend to complete a FIT but this is not reflected in uptake rates. Planning interventions can bridge this intention-behaviour gap. To develop a tool supp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ open Vol. 12; no. 9; p. e062738
Main Authors Kotzur, Marie, Macdonald, Sara, O'Carroll, Ronan E, O'Connor, Rory C, Irvine, Audrey, Steele, Robert J C, Robb, Kathryn A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England British Medical Journal Publishing Group 05.09.2022
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
SeriesOriginal research
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062738

Cover

More Information
Summary:ObjectiveColorectal screening using faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) can save lives if the people invited participate. In Scotland, most people intend to complete a FIT but this is not reflected in uptake rates. Planning interventions can bridge this intention-behaviour gap. To develop a tool supporting people willing to do colorectal screening with planning to complete a FIT, this study aimed to identify frequently experienced barriers and solutions to these barriers.DesignThis is a cross-sectional study.SettingParticipants were recruited through the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme to complete a mailed questionnaire.ParticipantsThe study included 2387 participants who had completed a FIT (mean age 65 years, 40% female) and 359 participants who had not completed a FIT but were inclined to do so (mean age 63 years, 39% female).Outcome measuresThe questionnaire assessed frequency of endorsement of colorectal screening barriers and solutions.ResultsParticipants who had not completed a FIT endorsed significantly more barriers than those who had completed a FIT, when demographic, health and behavioural covariates were held constant (F(1,2053)=13.40, p<0.001, partial η2=0.01). Participants who completed a FIT endorsed significantly more solutions than those who did not (U=301 585.50, z=−3.21, p<0.001, r=0.06). This difference became insignificant when covariates were controlled. Participants agreed on the most common barriers and solutions regardless of screening history. Barriers included procrastination, forgetting, fear of the test result, screening anxiety, disgust and low self-efficacy. Solutions included hand-washing, doing the FIT in private, reading the FIT instructions, benefit of early detection, feelings of responsibility, high self-efficacy and seeing oneself as a person who looks after one’s health.ConclusionThis survey identified six barriers and seven solutions as key content to include in the development of a planning tool for colorectal screening using the FIT. Participatory research is required to codesign an engaging and accessible planning tool.
Bibliography:Original research
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2044-6055
2044-6055
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062738