Paediatric reproducibility limits for the forced expiratory volume in 1 s

• Published in: Thorax Vol. 75; no. 10; pp. 891 - 896
• Main Authors: Stanojevic, Sanja, Filipow, Nicole, Ratjen, Felix
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Thoracic Society 01.10.2020; BMJ Publishing Group LTD
• Subjects: Adolescent; Age; Age Factors; Antibiotics; Child; Child, Preschool; Cystic fibrosis; Cystic Fibrosis - diagnosis; Cystic Fibrosis - physiopathology; Female; Forced Expiratory Volume - physiology; Humans; Male; Pediatrics; Reproducibility; Reproducibility of Results; Respiratory physiology; Retrospective Studies; Spirometry; Vital Capacity; cystic fibrosis; reproducibility; spirometry
• ISSN: 0040-6376; 1468-3296; 1468-3296
• DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214817

BackgroundCurrent reproducibility standards for spirometry were derived using a small adult dataset and may not be optimal for interpretation of repeated measurements of lung function in children.ObjectiveTo define reproducibility limits for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) change that represent the normal within-subject between-visit variability in healthy children and evaluate these limits as a tool to monitor children with cystic fibrosis (CF).MethodsRepeated FEV1 measurements (3 months to 5 years apart) from healthy children from the Global Lung Function Initiative data repository were used to derive a conditional change score. Spirometry and clinical data from a CF clinical database was used to verify utility in clinical practice.ResultsA reproducibility change score was derived from 47 938 FEV1 measures from 7885 healthy children 6–18 years of age. The simple algorithm, which is conditional on the initial measurement, also accounts for age and time interval between measurements. The change score limits of reproducibility were much narrower than currently used cut-offs. Specifically, changes, considered as improvements using either a 12% or 10% relative change from baseline, are too wide for children. In CF, there was overall agreement between different approaches, with the distinct advantage that the change score was not biased by regression to the mean.ConclusionsCompared with current approaches to interpretation of repeated lung function measurements, the proposed change score was less biased and provides a simple alternative to reduce misinterpretation.