Detection of sudomotor alterations evaluated by Sudoscan in patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes

IntroductionDiabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) causes morbidity and affects the quality of life. Before diabetes diagnosis, neuropathic damage may be present. Sudoscan provides accurate measurement of the sudomotor function. This study aimed to assess the abnormalities detected by Sudoscan, offere...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ open diabetes research & care Vol. 10; no. 6; p. e003005
Main Authors García-Ulloa, Ana Cristina, Almeda-Valdes, Paloma, Cuatecontzi-Xochitiotzi, Teresa Enedina, Ramírez-García, Jorge Alberto, Díaz-Pineda, Michelle, Garnica-Carrillo, Fernanda, González-Duarte, Alejandra, Narayan, K M Venkat, Aguilar-Salinas, Carlos Alberto, Hernández-Jiménez, Sergio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England American Diabetes Association 01.12.2022
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
BMJ Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:IntroductionDiabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) causes morbidity and affects the quality of life. Before diabetes diagnosis, neuropathic damage may be present. Sudoscan provides accurate measurement of the sudomotor function. This study aimed to assess the abnormalities detected by Sudoscan, offered estimates of DPN prevalence, and investigated the relationship between metabolic and clinical parameters. Additionally, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the Sudoscan compared with monofilament and tuning fork tests for detecting DPN.Research design and methodsCross-sectional descriptive study including patients with type 2 diabetes for <5 years since diagnosis. We investigated the presence of DPN using a 128 Hz tuning fork test, the 10 g monofilament, and the sudomotor dysfunction in feet using Sudoscan. We compared patients with and without alterations in the Sudoscan. A logistic regression model analyzed variables independently associated with sudomotor dysfunction.ResultsFrom 2013 to 2020, 2243 patients were included, 55.1% women, age 51.8 years, and 17.1% with normal weight. Monofilament tests and/or tuning fork examination were abnormal in 29% (95% CI 0.23% to 0.27%) and 619 patients (27.6%, 0.25% to 0.29%) had sudomotor alterations. In logistic regression analysis, age (β=1.01, 0.005–1.02), diastolic blood pressure (β=0.98, 0.96–0.99), heart rate (β=1.01, 1.00–1.02), glucose (β=1.00, 1.00–1.03), albuminuria (β=1.001, 1.000–1.001), beta-blockers=1.98, 1.21–3.24) and fibrate use=0.61, 0.43–0.87) were associated with sudomotor dysfunction. The AUC (area under the curve) for Sudoscan was 0.495 (0.469–0.522), with sensitivity and specificity of 24% and 71%, respectively.ConclusionThe Sudoscan identified an important proportion of patients with dysfunction, allowing prompt intervention to decrease the risk for complications.Trial registration numberNCT02836808.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2052-4897
2052-4897
DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-003005