Fall prevention implementation strategies in use at 60 United States hospitals: a descriptive study

BackgroundTo guide fall prevention efforts, United States organisations, such as the Joint Commission and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, have recommended organisational-level implementation strategies: leadership support, interdisciplinary falls committees, electronic health record...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMJ quality & safety Vol. 29; no. 12; pp. 1000 - 1007
Main Authors Turner, Kea, Staggs, Vincent, Potter, Catima, Cramer, Emily, Shorr, Ronald, Mion, Lorraine C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.12.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:BackgroundTo guide fall prevention efforts, United States organisations, such as the Joint Commission and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, have recommended organisational-level implementation strategies: leadership support, interdisciplinary falls committees, electronic health record tools, and staff, family and patient education. It is unclear whether hospitals adhere to such strategies or how these strategies are operationalised.ObjectiveTo identify and describe the prevalence of specific hospital fall prevention implementation strategies.MethodsIn 2017, we surveyed 80 US hospitals participating in the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators who volunteered for the study. We conducted descriptive statistics by calculating percentages for categorical variables and the median and IQR for count variables.ResultsA total of 60/80 (75%) of hospitals completed the survey. The majority of hospitals were not-for-profit (98%) and urban (90%); more than half were Magnet (53%), small (53%) and teaching (52%). Hospitals were more likely to use leadership strategies, such as updating fall policies in the past 3 years (98%) but less likely to reward staff (40%). Hospitals commonly used interdisciplinary falls committees (83%) but membership rarely included physicians. Hospitals lacked access to electronic health record tools, such as high-risk medication warnings (27%). Education strategies were commonly used; 100% of hospitals provided fall education at staff orientation, but only 22% educated all employees (not just nursing staff).ConclusionsOur study is the first to our knowledge to examine which expert-recommended implementation strategies are being used and how they are being operationalised in US hospitals. Future studies are needed to document fall prevention implementation strategies in detail and to test which implementation strategies are most effective at reducing falls. Additionally, research is needed to evaluate the quality of implementation (eg, fidelity) of fall prevention interventions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Contributors KT drafted the manuscript and conducted the analyses. VS, CP and EC provided guidance on the data analyses and reviewed drafts of the manuscript. LCM and RS oversaw the data collection and analyses process, reviewed the manuscript and provided overall guidance on the study.
ISSN:2044-5415
2044-5423
2044-5423
DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010642