Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction in Women With Type 2 Diabetes Measured by Coronary Phase Contrast Flow Velocity Magnetic Resonance Imaging

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine if differences in coronary endothelial function are observed between asymptomatic women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and control subjects using coronary phase contrast flow velocity magnetic resonance imaging in response to cold pressor stress, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of investigative medicine Vol. 63; no. 7; pp. 856 - 861
Main Authors Maroules, Christopher D., Chang, Alice Y., Kotys-Traughber, Melanie S., Peshock, Ronald M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.10.2015
Sage Publications Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1081-5589
1708-8267
1708-8267
DOI10.1097/JIM.0000000000000226

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine if differences in coronary endothelial function are observed between asymptomatic women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and control subjects using coronary phase contrast flow velocity magnetic resonance imaging in response to cold pressor stress, an established endothelium-dependent vasodilatory stress.MethodsPhase contrast flow velocity imaging of the right coronary artery was performed in 7 asymptomatic premenopausal women with DM and 8 healthy female participants in response to the cold pressor test at 3 T.ResultsThere was no significant difference in percent increase in coronary flow velocity from rest to peak flow velocity between DM and control subjects (32% ± 22% vs 46% ± 17%; P = 0.11). However, percent increase in coronary flow velocity was lower in DM than in control subjects (−3% ± 14% vs 31% ± 30%; P = 0.01) during the second minute of cold pressor stress, when endothelial-mediated vasodilation should occur.ConclusionsAsymptomatic women with DM demonstrate reduced coronary flow velocity during the second minute of cold pressor stress, indicating coronary endothelial dysfunction.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1081-5589
1708-8267
1708-8267
DOI:10.1097/JIM.0000000000000226