Shoulder pain and external rotation in spastic hemiplegia do not improve by injection of botulinum toxin A into the subscapular muscle

Objective:To study the effect of botulinum toxin A in the subscapular muscle on shoulder pain and humerus external rotation.Methods:22 stroke patients with spastic hemiplegia, substantial shoulder pain and reduced external rotation of the humerus participated in a randomised, double blind, placebo c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry Vol. 79; no. 5; pp. 581 - 583
Main Authors de Boer, K S, Arwert, H J, de Groot, J H, Meskers, C G M, Mishre, A D Rambaran, Arendzen, J H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 01.05.2008
BMJ
BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective:To study the effect of botulinum toxin A in the subscapular muscle on shoulder pain and humerus external rotation.Methods:22 stroke patients with spastic hemiplegia, substantial shoulder pain and reduced external rotation of the humerus participated in a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled effect study. Injections of either botulinum toxin A (Botox, 2×50 units) or placebo were applied to the subscapular muscle at two locations. Pain was scored on a 100 mm vertical Visual Analogue Scale; external rotation was recorded by means of electronic goniometry. Assessments were carried out at 0 (baseline), 6 and 12 weeks.Results:21 patients completed the study. We observed no significant changes in pain or external rotation as a result of administration of botulinum toxin A. External rotation improved significantly (p = 0.001) for both the treatment group (20.4° (16.6) to 32.1° (14.0)) and the control group (10.3° (19.5) to 23.7° (20.7)) as a function of time.Conclusions:Application of botulinum toxin A into the subscapular muscle for reduction of shoulder pain and improvement of humeral external rotation in spastic hemiplegia does not appear to be clinically efficacious.
Bibliography:istex:C50928F14FE89C2D2892F3FCA33B1DD3AD3EE1C5
ark:/67375/NVC-W9DB2LH4-4
PMID:18408090
href:jnnp-79-581.pdf
ArticleID:jn128371
local:jnnp;79/5/581
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-3050
1468-330X
DOI:10.1136/jnnp.2007.128371