A randomised, parallel-group comparison study of diquafosol ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye in China and Singapore

AimsTo compare the efficacy and safety of 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution with those of 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye in China and Singapore.MethodsA total of 497 patients with dry eye (Schirmer's test, 5 mm; fluorescein and RB score, 3 points) from Chin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of ophthalmology Vol. 99; no. 7; pp. 903 - 908
Main Authors Gong, Lan, Sun, Xinghuai, Ma, Zhizhong, Wang, Qinmei, Xu, Xun, Chen, Xiaoming, Shao, Yan, Yao, Ke, Tang, Luosheng, Gu, Yangshun, Yuan, Huiping, Chua, Wei Han, Chuan, Jacob Cheng Yen, Tong, Louis
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01.07.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AimsTo compare the efficacy and safety of 3% diquafosol ophthalmic solution with those of 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution in patients with dry eye in China and Singapore.MethodsA total of 497 patients with dry eye (Schirmer's test, 5 mm; fluorescein and RB score, 3 points) from China and Singapore were randomised to receive either diquafosol ophthalmic solution (diquafosol) or sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution (HA) at 1:1 ratio. The fluorescein staining scores and rose bengal (RB) subjective symptom scores and tear film breakup time were evaluated before treatment and 2 and 4 weeks after start of treatment.ResultsIn the diquafosol group, changes in fluorescein and RB scores compared with baseline at week 4 or at the time of discontinuation were −2.1±1.5 and −2.5±2.0, respectively. Compared with the HA group, changes in fluorescein score were non-inferior and changes in RB score were superior (p=0.019). In addition, diquafosol and HA improved tear film breakup time by 1.046±1.797 and 0.832±1.775 s, respectively (no significant intergroup difference). Adverse event onset rates were 16.3% (40 of 246 subjects) and 10.0% (25 of 251 subjects) in the diquafosol group and HA group, respectively, with borderline significant intergroup differences (p=0.046), while adverse drug reaction incidence rates were 12.2% (30 of 246 subjects) and 6.0% (15 of 251 subjects), respectively (p=0.019). Only mild adverse drug reactions (>2%) in the form of eye discharge, itching or irritation were observed.ConclusionsDiquafosol improved fluorescein staining score in a manner similar to HA, and significantly improved RB score compared with HA.Trial registration numberNCT01101984.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0007-1161
1468-2079
1468-2079
DOI:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-306084