Are protected areas really protecting populations? A test with an Atlantic rain forest palm

• Published in: Tropical conservation science Vol. 3; no. 4; pp. 361 - 372
• Main Authors: de Cássia Quitete Portela, Rita, Bruna, Emilio M, dos Santos, Flavio Antonio Maës
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.12.2010
• Subjects: Atlantic rainforest fragments; capuchin monkey; Cebus; Demography; Euterpe; Euterpe edulis; Forests; Growth rate; Harvesting; LTRE; Plant populations; Protected areas; Seedlings; Survival; Tropical environments; A, Atlantic; LTRE; Atlantic rainforest fragments; Euterpe edulis; capuchin monkey
• ISSN: 1940-0829; 1940-0829
• DOI: 10.1177/194008291000300402

We compared the demography of the palm Euterpe edulis in a large forest fragment that is protected from palm harvesting with that in three smaller fragments where harvesting has occurred. Palms were censused from 2005 to 2007 in nine 30 m × 30 m plots in each forest fragment. Each individual was assigned to one of five stage classes: seedling, infant, juvenile, immature, and reproductive. Using summary matrices constructed for the fragments and a matrix for the population in the protected area, we compared the asymptotic growth rate (lgr;) in the protected and non-protected areas. We then quantified the contribution of each lower-level vital rate to the observed differences in lgr; using a fixed-design LTRE. Euterpe edulis populations in the protected area are projected to shrink at rates of 4.54 to 12.6% per year, and the populations of the fragments are projected to grow at rates of 3.44 to 9.43% per year. Our LTRE analysis revealed that the generally higher lgr; for the summary matrix based on the populations in fragments was due primarily to greater survival of immatures and reproductives. However, seedling growth contributed negatively to lgr; in the fragments. We also found that great numbers of immatures and reproductives were killed by the capuchin monkey (Cebus nigritus), which apparently also contributes to the differences between the protected area and the fragments. This study lends support to the idea that small fragments in a landscape actively managed and modified by humans can be very important in maintaining viable plant populations.