Explicitly Linking Human Impact to Ecological Function in Secondary School Classrooms
Both the old National Science Education Standards (NSES) and the recent "Next Generation Science Standards" (NGSS) devote significant resources to learning about human environmental impact. Whereas the NSES advocate learning about human environmental impact in a section apart from the scie...
Saved in:
Published in | The American biology teacher Vol. 76; no. 8; pp. 508 - 515 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
University of California Press
01.10.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Both the old National Science Education Standards (NSES) and the recent "Next Generation Science Standards" (NGSS) devote significant resources to learning about human environmental impact. Whereas the NSES advocate learning about human environmental impact in a section apart from the science- content learning strands, the NGSS embed them in the core life- science and ecology learning strands. We describe a study that compared the effects of these different approaches on ninth-grade biology student learning. It found that students learned significantly more human-environmental-impact and ecological-function content when human-impact content was embedded in ecology content than when human impact was taught as a discrete unit from ecology. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-7685 |
DOI: | 10.1525/abt.2014.76.8.4 |