Protecting the stars of tomorrow: do international cardiovascular preparticipation screening policies account for the paediatric athlete? A systematic review and quality appraisal

• Published in: British journal of sports medicine Vol. 57; no. 6; pp. 371 - 380
• Main Authors: Riding, Nathan R, Dorobantu, Dan-Mihai, Williams, Craig A, Stuart, Graham, Fritsch, Peter, Wilson, Mathew G, Mossialos, Elias, Pieles, Guido
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine 01.03.2023; BMJ Publishing Group LTD
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Adults; Age; Athletes; Cardiology; Child; Heart; Heart Diseases; Humans; Medicine; Pathology; Pediatrics; Physiology; Public Policy; PubMed; Retrospective Studies; Review; Sports medicine; Systematic review; Teenagers; Heart; Pediatrics; Athletes; Cardiology; Adolescent
• ISSN: 0306-3674; 1473-0480
• DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-105659

Objective(1) Identify and review current policies for the cardiovascular screening of athletes to assess their applicability to the paediatric population and (2) evaluate the quality of these policy documents using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool.DesignSystematic review and quality appraisal of policy documents.Data sourcesA systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, SportDiscus and CINAHL.Eligibility criteria for selecting studiesAn article was included if it was a policy/position statement/guideline/consensus or recommendation paper relating to athletes and cardiovascular preparticipation screening.Results and summaryOf the 1630 articles screened, 13 met the inclusion criteria. Relevance to paediatric athletes was found to be high in 3 (23%), moderate in 6 (46%) and low in 4 (31%), and only 2 provide tailored guidance for the athlete aged 12–18 years. A median 5 related citations per policy investigated solely paediatric athletes, with study designs most commonly being retrospective (72%). AGREEII overall quality scores ranged from 25% to 92%, with a median of 75%. The lowest scoring domains were rigour of development; (median 32%) stakeholder involvement (median 47%) and Applicability (median 52%).ConclusionCardiac screening policies for athletes predominantly focus on adults, with few providing specific recommendations for paediatric athletes. The overall quality of the policies was moderate, with more recent documents scoring higher. Future research is needed in paediatric athletes to inform and develop cardiac screening guidelines, to improve the cardiac care of youth athletes.