Measuring the learning capacity of organisations: development and factor analysis of the Questionnaire for Learning Organizations
AimsTo investigate internal consistency and factor structure of a questionnaire measuring learning capacity based on Senge's theory of the five disciplines of a learning organisation: Personal Mastery, Mental Models, Shared Vision, Team Learning, and Systems Thinking.DesignCross-sectional study...
Saved in:
Published in | BMJ quality & safety Vol. 20; no. 4; pp. 307 - 313 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
01.04.2011
BMJ Publishing Group LTD |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | AimsTo investigate internal consistency and factor structure of a questionnaire measuring learning capacity based on Senge's theory of the five disciplines of a learning organisation: Personal Mastery, Mental Models, Shared Vision, Team Learning, and Systems Thinking.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingSubstance-abuse treatment centres (SATCs) in The Netherlands.ParticipantsA total of 293 SATC employees from outpatient and inpatient treatment departments, financial and human resources departments.Main outcome measuresPsychometric properties of the Questionnaire for Learning Organizations (QLO), including factor structure, internal consistency, and interscale correlations.FindingsA five-factor model representing the five disciplines of Senge showed good fit. The scales for Personal Mastery, Shared Vision and Team Learning had good internal consistency, but the scales for Systems Thinking and Mental Models had low internal consistency.ConclusionsThe proposed five-factor structure was confirmed in the QLO, which makes it a promising instrument to assess learning capacity in teams. The Systems Thinking and the Mental Models scales have to be revised. Future research should be aimed at testing criterion and discriminatory validity. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | PMID:21292691 istex:A56841E53B0E8F2B843F3BE85B4AB83F69E496EF href:qhc-20-307.pdf ark:/67375/NVC-TWM02S5Z-7 ArticleID:qhc42556 local:qhc;20/4/307 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2044-5415 2044-5423 |
DOI: | 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.042556 |